CONGRESS PUTS CARBON TAX BACK ON TABLE AFTER IT FAILED IN 2018
Would hit coal mines, oil refineries hardest
A pair of U.S. congressmen from Florida are making a renewed bipartisan push for carbon tax legislation that failed to gain traction in 2018, The Washington Examiner reported.
Reps. Ted Deutch, a Democrat, and Francis Rooney, a Republican, are planning to reintroduce a bill Thursday that would place a $15-per-ton tax on carbon emissions in 2019. The tax would rise by $10-a-year increments until it hits nearly $100 per ton.
“I am supportive of a carbon fee as a non-regulatory, revenue-neutral and market-driven incentive to move toward natural gas and away from coal, and to support emerging alternate sources of energy,” Rooney told The Washington Examiner. “This bill provides a method of ensuring that any fees are rebated back to the public.”
The pair of legislators, who co-chair the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, partnered with other lawmakers to introduce an earlier version of the same bill in November 2018. That bill did not come up for a vote and died after the new session of Congress began.
The proposal is revenue neutral, or does not create another source of tax revenue for the federal government to tap into and divert for other causes. The money collected through the proposed carbon tax would be redistributed in equal amounts back to American families.
The tax would hit large carbon producers hardest, such as coal mines and oil refineries, and trickle down to manufacturers, automakers and other industries. It would also hit Americans in the form of higher energy costs and more expensive goods. The carbon tax rebate received by families is supposed to counter the increased price of energy.
Carbon tax proposals suffered a string of defeats last year at the national and state levels. Several carbon tax bills in the House and Senate failed to gain significant support and a carbon tax ballot measure in Washington state, meant to test the popularity of similar climate change tools, failed despite significant environmental and political backing.
Carlos Curbelo, a former U.S. representative from Florida, lost his bid for re-election in 2018 after leading the push to take up carbon tax legislation.
Carbon taxes, as a policy tool, sit in limbo between the general agendas of Republicans and Democrats. Conservatives say the policy hits impoverished and low-income families hardest by making goods more expensive while failing to effect any significant change. Environmentalists and Democrats usually tend to support government mandates to combat climate change.
Related:
Potholer Vs. Real Science (Tony Heller)
In this video, I debunk Potholer's junk science video he made in response to my previous video debunking another of his junk science videos.
Tony's made a number of straightforward observations here that highlight the errors in the AGW position pushed by Potholer. See video - whether we are talking about the Northern or Southern Hemisphere the global warming advocates predict significant rises in temperature for each 100ppm rise or fall of CO2. This is not borne out in reality. In regards to the academic papers being cited, Tony points to the problems with the papers whereas it seems Potholer often uses material uncritically. This is a big problem for AGW proponents because we KNOW the data in many instances have been altered to suit the warming hypothesis. What must happen is an argument should be made as to why the problematic papers are still sound.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 21st, 2019.]
Related:
Debunking Potholer54 and Global Warming/Climate Change Propaganda:
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/02/debunking-potholer54-and-global.html
Tony's made a number of straightforward observations here that highlight the errors in the AGW position pushed by Potholer. See video - whether we are talking about the Northern or Southern Hemisphere the global warming advocates predict significant rises in temperature for each 100ppm rise or fall of CO2. This is not borne out in reality. In regards to the academic papers being cited, Tony points to the problems with the papers whereas it seems Potholer often uses material uncritically. This is a big problem for AGW proponents because we KNOW the data in many instances have been altered to suit the warming hypothesis. What must happen is an argument should be made as to why the problematic papers are still sound.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 21st, 2019.]
Related:
Debunking Potholer54 and Global Warming/Climate Change Propaganda:
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/02/debunking-potholer54-and-global.html
