Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Why Trump Was Right to Reverse Obama’s Policy on Military Gear for Police - President Trump to lift Obama ban on military gear for cops - Riots About To Come To Screeching Halt After What Trump Just Gave ALL Police Permission To Do

"It's important to point out that this program has been around for a very long time before President Obama decided to put a hold on it essentially... President Obama's argument for taking it off of the table was that it creates distrust between local communities and local police that they're over-militarized. That's a fine and fair argument to make, however, the police would argue that in the age of terrorism response and rioting they have to be prepared with the equipment they need to stop riots from turning into full-fledged chaos as we saw in Ferguson...

We're talking about leftover ammunition, body armor, shields, in some cases grenade launchers, people think oh my gosh local police are going to have grenade launchers, they're not going to use them for grenades, they're going to use them for tear gas...

Again I wan't to stress that this is not something that the Trump administration is really changing or putting forward that's any different than administrations prior to the Obama administration. In fact, throughout President Obama's, the majority of his terms, 7 years of his first and second term, he had this policy in place because it's something that had worked in previous administrations, George W. Bush and Bill Clinton. So the Trump administration is simply reverting back to something that they saw used against the drug war in the 90s going into the 2000s that will certainly use against the opioid crisis here in 2017...

Officials pointing out further to FOX News, most of this equipment... is defensive in nature or used in search and rescue and disaster relief, such as by the way what we're seeing down in Houston right now..."

How a Trump administration decision could send military surplus to police departments

Many of the of the 2,400 line-items detailed in the data obtained by NJ Advance Media were for construction and maintenance such as tools, medical kits, forklifts, dump trucks, mop heads and sandbags...
Local agencies also received 196 Humvees and military cargo trucks over the same two-year span. No weapons or helicopters were acquired by Garden State agencies over that time. 

Why Trump Was Right to Reverse Obama’s Policy on Military Gear for Police

John G. Malcolm /  / 
Speaking to a supportive crowd at the national convention of the Fraternal Order of Police, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that President Donald Trump would shortly sign an executive order—which he has now done—rolling back limitations that had been placed by the Obama administration on the ability of the military to transfer excess equipment to civilian law enforcement authorities.
Sessions told the crowd:
President Trump is serious about this mission. He is doing all he can to restore law and order and support our police across America. And that is why, today, I am here to announce that President Trump is issuing an executive order that will make it easier to protect yourselves and your communities. He is rescinding restrictions from the prior administration that limited your agencies’ ability to get equipment through federal programs, including life-saving gear like Kevlar vests and helmets and first responder and rescue equipment like what they’re using in Texas right now.
The so-called “1033 program” was created by Congress as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, which was signed into law in 1996 by President Bill Clinton. This program allowed the Defense Department to transfer excess military equipment to civilian law enforcement agencies.
Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can't be done alone. Find out more >>
As of 2014, approximately 8,000 local law enforcement agencies have participated in the program resulting in more than $5.4 billion in previously purchased, surplus military gear—including computers, air conditioners, clothing, medical supplies, flashlights, ammunition, rifles, helmets, helicopters, and armored vehicles—being recycled for domestic law enforcement purposes.
In the wake of the riots in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014 following the death of Michael Brown, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13688, which established a Law Enforcement Equipment Working Group.
That group subsequently issued a report recommending that the military be prohibited from transferring certain equipment, such as camouflage uniforms, high-caliber weapons, grenade launchers, and armored vehicles, with additional controls placed on the transfer of other equipment.
At the time he signed the executive order, Obama stated, “We’ve seen how militarized gear can sometimes give people a feeling like there’s an occupying force as opposed to a force that’s part of the community that’s protecting and serving them.”
He continued, “It can alienate and intimidate local residents and send the wrong message.”
While there have been occasions where law enforcement officials have overreacted and have unwittingly inflamed a situation, it is also true that there are occasions where law enforcement authorities need such equipment in order to protect the public—for instance, during terrorist attacks, search and rescue operations, or in the wake of natural disasters.
Equipment provided through this program is currently being deployed in Texas to save lives in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey. Such equipment also resulted in lives saved during police operations in response to the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino in 2015 and at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando in 2016.
study released earlier this month, titled “Police Officer on the Frontline or a Soldier? The Effect of Police Militarization on Crime,” concludes that a “10 percent increase in the total value of military aid [given to a community] leads to a decrease of 5.9 crimes per 100,000 population” and that such aid is associated with a reduction in complaints about crime from local citizens.
The authors of this study estimate that $5,800 worth of military gear can result in savings to society (based on the average cost of a crime) of $112,000, thereby making military aid “a very inexpensive crime-reducing tool” compared to other types of law enforcement expenditures.
Obama certainly had a point that law enforcement authorities must be vigilant as to how and when they deploy such equipment, and should guard against overly aggressive approaches that might unduly and unnecessarily alarm the public.
Law enforcement officers should establish guidelines governing such usage and should be adequately trained in using it.
Nonetheless, one cannot deny that when law enforcement authorities need such equipment, they really, really need it—and we need them to have it. As Sessions stated in his remarks to the Fraternal Order of Police, referring to the restrictions imposed by the Obama administration:
Those restrictions went too far. We will not put superficial concerns above public safety. All you need to do is turn on a TV right now to see that for Houstonians this isn’t about appearances, it’s about getting the job done and getting everyone to safety. The executive order the president will sign today will ensure that you can get the life-saving gear that you need to do your job and send a strong message that we will not allow criminal activity, violence, and lawlessness to become the new normal. And we will save taxpayer money in the meantime.

Republican Senator Rand Paul should have said “the militarization of our law 
enforcement is due to an unprecedented expansion of Antifa and BLM violence in 
this realm. Thanks for militarizing the police you Useful Idiot dumb-asses.


Why Trump Was Right to Reverse Obama’s Policy on Military Gear for Police - President Trump to lift Obama ban on military gear for cops - Riots About To Come To Screeching Halt After What Trump Just Gave ALL Police Permission To Do