Saturday, October 13, 2018

The Peer-Review Process is Corrupt and on Its Own Means NOTHING

Academic Trolls Submit Fake Papers to Universities, Most Were Accepted | Academic Grievance Study

Watch this video to learn about a hoax global warming paper positing penises as being causal to climate change, which passed peer-review!

Also see:

ASCE Journals refuse to correct fraudulent paper they published on WTC collapses, by Tony Szamboti and Richard Johns

A new letter has been published at the Journal of 9/11 Studies which expands upon the points made in the peer-reviewed paper “Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis.” As explained by the authors, what's particularly noteworthy is the JEM's unjustified reasons for rejecting their original paper. Very interesting considering that James Gourley also experienced problems with the JEM in publishing a response to Dr. Bazant et. al. I'm genuinely suspicious that the JEM may indeed have a bias towards Bazant and his "crush down/crush up" theory. 

More Info:


George Knapp Bigfoot DNA is unlike Anything Ever Seen - Why Melba Ketchum was Right about the DNA: Sasquatch is a Fellow Human Species: