Friday, July 20, 2018

Harvard Study Confirms Fluoride Reduces Children’s IQ


Recently-published Harvard University meta-analysis funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has concluded that children who live in areas with highly fluoridated water have “significantly lower” IQ scores than those who live in low fluoride areas. 

In a 32-page report that can be downloaded free of charge from Environmental Health Perspectives, the researchers said:

A recent report from the U.S. National Research Council (NRC 2006) concluded that adverse effects of high fluoride concentrations in drinking water may be of concern and that additional research is warranted. Fluoride may cause neurotoxicity in laboratory animals, including effects on learning and memory ...  
To summarize the available literature, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies on increased fluoride exposure in drinking water and neurodevelopmental delays. We specifically targeted studies carried out in rural China that have not been widely disseminated, thus complementing the studies that have been included in previous reviews and risk assessment reports ...  
Findings from our meta-analyses of 27 studies published over 22 years suggest an inverse association between high fluoride exposure and children’s intelligence ... The results suggest that fluoride may be a developmental neurotoxicant that affects brain development at exposures much below those that can cause toxicity in adults ...  
Serum-fluoride concentrations associated with high intakes from drinking-water may exceed 1 mg/L, or 50 Smol/L, thus more than 1000-times the levels of some other neurotoxicants that cause neurodevelopmental damage. Supporting the plausibility of our findings, rats exposed to 1 ppm (50 Smol/L) of water-fluoride for one year showed morphological alterations in the brain and increased levels of aluminum in brain tissue compared with controls ... 
In conclusion, our results support the possibility of adverse effects of fluoride exposures on children’s neurodevelopment. Future research should formally evaluate dose-response relations based on individual-level measures of exposure over time, including more precise prenatal exposure assessment and more extensive standardized measures of neurobehavioral performance, in addition to improving assessment and control of potential confounders.
Studies Have Repeatedly Linked Fluoride to Reduced IQ and Brain Damage

There are so many scientific studies showing the direct, toxic effects of fluoride on your body, it’s truly remarkable that it’s NOT considered a scientific consensus by now. Despite the evidence against it, fluoride is still added to 70 percent of U.S. public drinkingwater supplies. 

It amazes me that the medical (and dental) communities are so stubbornly resistant to connect the dots when it comes to the skyrocketing increase of cognitive decline in adults and behavioral issues in children (ADD, ADHD, depression and learning disabilities of all kinds). In fact, there have been more than 23 human studies and 100 animal studies linking fluoride to brain damage. Fluoride can also increase manganese absorption, compounding problems, since manganese in drinking water has also been linked to lower IQ in children. 

Reported effects of fluoride on your brain include:

• Reduction in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
• Damage to your hippocampus
• Formation of beta-amyloid plaques (the classic brain abnormality in Alzheimer’s disease)
• Reduction in lipid content
• Damage to purkinje cells
• Exacerbation of lesions induced by iodine deficiency
• Impaired antioxidant defense systems
• Increased uptake of aluminum
• Accumulation of fluoride in your pineal gland
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-mercola/fluoride_b_2479833.html

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 20th, 2018.]

Related:

Over 4,000 Professionals Call for an End to Water Fluoridation - Learn Why, How You Can Help Their Campaign, & How to Filter Fluoride in Your Drinking Water:

http://welcometohealth.blogspot.com/2014/09/over-4000-professionals-call-for-end-to.html

Russia Didn't Do It - A Letter to Australian Senator Craig Kelly Over Comments Made About the MH17 Shoot Down

Hello Senator Kelly,

Recently you copped a lot of flak for saying that we should “look over” the MH17 incident when it comes to the rebuilding of US-Russian relations. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-07-19/craig-kelly-apologises-for-mh17-comments/10012162
I am writing to inform you that the Russians most likely had nothing to do with the incident.  

A review of the evidence shows that two possibilities exist. That the aircraft was brought down accidentallyby an air-to-air missile or that the aircraft was deliberately brought down by an air-to-air missile. The former possibility would be a Ukrainian assassination attempt gone wrong on President Putin’s aircraft that flew near to this area an hour or so earlier (the colour schemes of both aircraft are similar), while the latter possibility would be the deliberate downing of a commercial airliner in order to vilify the rebels and Russia.
The reason I have concluded that an air-to-air missile was used, and not a large ground-launched BUK system, is the lack of damage inflicted upon the aircraft. All interested parties agree, due to triangulation of the shrapnel impacts, that the warhead detonated a few meters from the cockpit. The problem is that tests done in Russia with a real BUK warhead saw much larger damage patterns with warhead fragments flying clean through one side of the cockpit and out the other. This sort of damage was not seen in the wreckage of MH17. 
'MH17 crash' test simulation video: Il-86 plane cockpit hit with BUK missile
Furthermore, the Dutch led investigation claimed that butterfly shaped shrapnel was used in the warhead, recovering such fragments from the pilots bodies. However actual tests with such warheads always leave butterfly shaped holes in the aircraft skin and none were seen in the MH17 wreckage. This sort of discrepancy points to fraud conducted by the Dutch in this case. It also casts doubt on the claim they recovered parts of the BUK missile from the crash site, as opposed to getting parts from the Ukrainian authorities that have this weapon in their inventory. 
Here is the Dutch public presentation, that is very light when it comes to discussing the forensics: 
Dutch Safety Board MH17 final report (FULL VIDEO)
It should be further noted that the Dutch did not perform any physical tests in order to replicate what happened to MH17, they only ran computer simulations that showed blast patterns too small to be from a large BUK warhead. 
I recommend you review the full Russian Arms manufacturer investigation into this incident. Nothing that they have put forward here has been disproved. Their conclusion was that perhaps an older model BUK warhead was used in the incident, not using butterfly shrapnel, a type the Russian army no longer employs. Their presentation data actually shows that the warhead used was much smaller than the alleged BUK – which is why I strongly suspect an air-to-air weapon.
Russian arms manufacturer Almaz-Antey delivers MH17 report
In fact there were witnesses that said they saw a fighter-sized “military jet(s)” flying in the region at the time MH17 came down – aircraft that carry air-to-air missiles. This is something the Ukraine authorities deny happened. Nevertheless, BBC Russia correspondents interviewed people on the ground who said they saw these jets:
Deleted BBC Russia MH17 report about 'Ukrainian military jets' (Eng Subs)
Adding to what appears to be a cover-up is the US refusal to release their spy satellite images of the area in the minutes after the incident. The Russians requested the US release their satellite images of the crime scene and Washington refused. A US satellite was right overhead at the time and would have easily seen the launch vehicle and the distinctive smoke trail from the missile. This smoke trail should have also been seen by witnesses for many miles around and would have appeared on cell phone videos and photographs - but wasn't. How is it that we have clear satellite imagery of Russian aircraft deployed in Syria and yet nothing for this incident?
When it comes to the Ukrainian Government claims about recordings of the rebels “admitting” to the shoot down, the recording they have appears to have been spliced together and it only shows that the rebels on the ground thought they had downed the aircraft. Having shot down other aircraft in the region (low altitude attack aircraft and transport planes using short range missiles), this was a logical assumption to make. It is not proof they were responsible. 
Timeframe: Expert dissects Ukraine's MH17 'smoking gun'
The Ukraine government also claimed there were videos showing a BUK missile launcher in rebel held areas missing a missile. However, the film in question comes from a time where the Ukrainian Government was in control of the area, well before the MH17 incident:
 "BUK" in Zugres
Mr Kelly, Russia has been falsely accused of this incident because key (corrupt) people within the Western power structure want to ramp up another Cold War. They will take advantage of any situation to do so, like they took advantage of the 911 attacks in order to attack Iraq, concocting connections between Saddam's Iraq and the threat of an al Qaeda WMD attack. 
Rather than “look over” what happened with the MH17 incident I would call for further investigations – calling on physical tests using BUK warheads AND air-to air missile warheads that would show the damage done to the aircraft was due to a smaller missile (thus ruling out the BUK hypothesis, and demolishing the Dutch investigators’ fraudulent case).  

When it comes to obfuscating the truth about aircraft shoot downs or crashes there are precedents – most notably the cover-up of the TWA Flight 800 incident that occurred on the same date (17/7) in 1996. Recently NTSB investigators came out and admitted the FBI doctored evidence to hide the fact that TWA 800 had been shot down (by accident, via the US Navy most likely). 

Thanks for your attention
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Ps. It’s likely our intelligence services know full well what happened here, but are playing along for geopolitical reasons.
PPs. For more on TWA Flight 800 start with: Silenced: Flight 800 And The Subversion Of Justice (2001) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DF68-HQ74tI&t=765s and then, New Evidence on TWA Flight 800 Disaster Revealed in Documentary - Megyn Kelly Reports - 6/19/13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qg0vN1j_Q0A 
__________________________________

This email was forwarded to ABC News Radio with the following intro:

Dear News Radio,

I recently sent a letter to Senator Craig Kelly about his comments on the MH17 shoot down. I told him we should look further into this incident because the physical evidence shows the Russians likely didn't do it and that the official investigation/narrative offered up by the West is a sham. Also, your coverage of the Trump-Putin meeting, stupidly pushing the mainstream media line that Trump trusts Russia more than the FBI, is ridiculous. The people squawking this rhetoric are crooked establishment types and dodgy politicians (all of whom hate Trump and are spinning what happened). Your coverage is Grossly Biased and I call on you to air opposing viewpoints which point out the FBI and CIA have histories of lying and distorting. 

When it comes to the US election hacking the fact is that the FBI has made a number of unfounded assertions about a hack whereas Wikileaks and experts like Bill Binney, formerly of the NSA, point out that the emails were leaked (not hacked). 

Here is my letter to Senator Craig Kelly. Please follow up and properly investigate what happened with MH17 rather than have spin doctoring foreign correspondents (like Matt Brown) fudge what happened:

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 20th, 2018.]

HACKS! Left-wing media cowards so SCARED Trump was going to get us into WAR now CALLING for one against RUSSIA

The same month uber-Left Guardian fretted, “Trump has taken us to the brink of nuclear war. Can he be stopped?

Far-Left Vox pondered in November 2017, “Trump can’t start a nuclear war by himself, but there’s not much stopping him.”

MSNBC hacks Joe Scarborough and bride Mika Brzezinski voiced ‘concern‘ earlier this year that Trump would get America into a nuclear exchange with North Korea.

And so on.

But now, after POTUS Trump’s landmark summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, some of these same Left-wing hacks are clamoring for the president to declare Putin’s 2016 election meddling “an act of war” which, generally speaking, provokes some sort of military response.

One of them is CNN host Chris Cuomo.
https://thenationalsentinel.com/2018/07/17/hacks-left-wing-media-cowards-so-scared-trump-was-going-to-get-us-into-war-now-calling-for-one-against-russia/

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 21st, 2018.]

REPORT: LISA PAGE CONFIRMS TRUMP IS RIGHT, MUELLER PROBE A WITCH HUNT

No basis for special counsel, she says under oath


FBI lawyer Lisa Page has confirmed that there was no basis for the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller, according to The Hill’s John Solomon.
The bombshell is based on a text FBI agent Peter Strzok sent to Page last year that read, “There’s no big there there,” suggesting the Russia investigation was baseless.
Investigators wanted to know what that text meant, but were refused an explanation by Stzrok in both closed and public testimony.
However, Page reportedly gave candid testimony during closed-door congressional hearings last week over the nature of the anti-Trump text messages with Strzok, who played key roles in both the Clinton email investigation and the “Russia collusion” probe.
Strzok declined to say – but Page, during a closed-door interview with lawmakers, confirmed in the most pained and contorted way that the message in fact referred to the quality of the Russia case, according to multiple eyewitnesses,” Solomon wrote Thursday.
The admission is deeply consequential. It means Rosenstein unleashed the most awesome powers of a special counsel to investigate an allegation that the key FBI officials, driving the investigation for 10 months beforehand, did not think was ‘there.’
Additionally, Page also admitted the bulk of the anti-Trump texts between her and Strzok “mean exactly what they say,” contradicting Strzok’s denial of anti-Trump bias in the Russia probe.
Her testimony further confirms President Trump’s suspicion that the Mueller probe is a political “witch hunt,” meant to cover for crimes committed by Democrats and the Deep State to sabotage a presidential election and overthrow a duly elected president.
“How can the Rigged Witch Hunt proceed when it was started, influenced and worked on, for an extended period of time, by former FBI Agent/Lover Peter Strzok? Read his hate filled and totally biased Emails and the answer is clear!” Trump tweeted earlier this month.
How can the Rigged Witch Hunt proceed when it was started, influenced and worked on, for an extended period of time, by former FBI Agent/Lover Peter Strzok? Read his hate filled and totally biased Emails and the answer is clear!


Related:

100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

Message To Trump: Pass Law Against Censorship & Political Discrimination



Message To Trump: Pass Law Against Censorship & Political Discrimination

Thursday, July 19, 2018

Midterm Banter: Trump Approval At 43%, Generic Ballot Steady, Polling Narrows



Midterm Banter: Trump Approval At 43%, Generic Ballot Steady, Polling Narrows

Trump Didn't "Misspeak" on Russia- He Told the Truth and Got Backlash - Big don backs down.



Trump Didn't "Misspeak" on Russia- He Told the Truth and Got Backlash - Big don backs down.

Whoopi Goldberg Abruptly Ends Contentious Jeanine Pirro Interview: ‘I’m Done’ - ‘F*CK YOU AND GET THE F*CK OUT!’: WHOOPI GOLDBERG GOT INTO HUGE FIGHT WITH JEANINE PIRRO BACKSTAGE - JUDGE JEANINE TRIGGERS WHOOPI: ‘YOU HAVE TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME’ – GETS SPIT ON - The View host proved she doesn’t have TDS by acting hysterical and stopping interview



Whoopi Goldberg went on to argue that she does not have Trump Derangement Syndrome and instead says she’s simply “Tired of people starting a conversation with ‘Mexicans are liars and rapists.'”
This is a media concocted lie. He was talking about border security - that not th
e best sort of people were crossing, that they were drug dealers, criminals and rapists (talking about a subset of illegals). He then went on to say that he has no problem with Mexicans or legal immigration!
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2016/11/the-pro-establishment-mainstream-media.html


‘F*CK YOU AND GET THE F*CK OUT!’: WHOOPI GOLDBERG GOT INTO HUGE FIGHT WITH JEANINE PIRRO BACKSTAGE:

During the screaming match, Pirro told Goldberg, “I’ve done more for abused women than you will ever do,” we hear.

https://pagesix.com/2018/07/19/whoopi-goldberg-and-jeanine-pirro-get-into-explosive-argument-at-the-view/?_ga=2.267069965.200300858.1531698117-945237880.1468689803

JUDGE JEANINE TRIGGERS WHOOPI: ‘YOU HAVE TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME’ – GETS SPIT ON

The View host proved she doesn’t have TDS by acting hysterical and stopping interview


Update: Jeanine Pirro claims Whoopi Goldberg spit on her and yelled, “Get the f**k out of this building!” following an on-air confrontation.




.@JudgeJeanine on what @WhoopiGoldberg did off stage: "I was leaving and she said ‘F you’ in my face – literally spitting at me, ‘F you, get the F out of this building.’ And I said to her, ‘did you just say that?’ She said that’s what I said, ‘get the F out of this building.’"
Read the original article below:
Appearing on The View, Judge Jeanine Pirro got liberal comedian Whoopi Goldberg riled up when she diagnosed her with a serious case of “Trump Derangement Syndrome.”
The Fox News host was discussing her new book Liars, Leakers, and Liberals: The Case Against the Anti-Trump Conspiracy on Thursday when Whoopi chimed into the conversation, saying, “Well here’s my question for you.”

Pirro cut in, “You’re suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome.”
“Did you just point at me?” Goldberg asked.
Judge Jeanine answered with a drawn out, “Yes.”
Whoopi Goldberg went on to argue that she does not have Trump Derangement Syndrome and instead says she’s simply “Tired of people starting a conversation with ‘Mexicans are liars and rapists.'”
“Listen, I’m 62-years-old, there have been a lot of people in office that I didn’t agree with, but I’ve never, ever seen anything like this. I’ve never seen anybody whip up such hate. I’ve never seen anybody be so dismissive,” she continued.
Whoopi did admit one thing everyone can agree on, which is her inability to figure out how to “fix this.”
After her admission, Goldberg changed the subject and asked Pirro, “How long has the Deep State been there and who’s running it?”
Ignoring the question and trying to get back on track, Judge Jeanine addressed The View host’s disagreement with Trump on illegal immigration.
“Whoopi, you know what’s horrible? When people who shouldn’t be here end up murdering the children of American citizens,” Pirro shouted over Goldberg.
“You know what’s horrible? When the President of The United States whips up people to beat the hell out of people. Say goodbye! Bye!” Whoopi shouted before ripping up her cue cards as the segment ended.
Following the commercial break, Whoopi opened the next segment with complete irony, saying, “So you saw me do something I very rarely do. I very rarely lose my cool and I’m not proud, I don’t like it. But, I also don’t like being accused of being hysterical.”
So basically her reaction to “being accused of being hysterical,” was to act hysterically.
Some people HATE the fact that I got along well with President Putin of Russia. They would rather go to war than see this. It’s called Trump Derangement Syndrome!

Whoopi Goldberg Abruptly Ends Contentious Jeanine Pirro Interview: ‘I’m Done’ - ‘F*CK YOU AND GET THE F*CK OUT!’: WHOOPI GOLDBERG GOT INTO HUGE FIGHT WITH JEANINE PIRRO BACKSTAGE - JUDGE JEANINE TRIGGERS WHOOPI: ‘YOU HAVE TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME’ – GETS SPIT ON - The View host proved she doesn’t have TDS by acting hysterical and stopping interview