Whenever Hillary speaks, one must look for the lies. The biggest lies in this speech were lies of omission. No mention of her support for the invasion of Iraq, no mention of the disaster she wrought in Libya, no mention of her contribution to pursuing endless death and destruction in the Middle East.
But she also lied in claiming partial credit for the Iran nuclear deal, which she had tended to block, and most profoundly in presenting herself as a champion of diplomacy. As Secretary of State, she blocked diplomacy that would have prevented or ended conflict, most notoriously concerning Libya, where even senior U.S. military officers were told to cut off their contacts with Gaddafi agents seeking a peaceful compromise.
The Washington Post reported prior to the speech that her campaign “hopes there are many more national-security-minded Republicans and independents who would vote for her, even grudgingly, rather than see Trump win the White House.”
The Washington Post noted that the state of California’s “defense industry and military bases lend a backdrop for her speech.” Indeed! Hillary Clinton is quite simply catering to the military-industrial complex, as she has been doing throughout her career. She is catering to the arms industry, which needs to keep the American people scared of various “threats” in order to continue draining the nation’s wealth into their profitable enterprises. She needs the support of military men and women who believe in all those threats invented by intellectuals in think tanks and editorial offices.
This is the core of the “national-security-minded” electorate that Hillary is targeting. She warned that Trump would jeopardize the wonderful bipartisan foreign policy that has been keeping us great and safe for decades.
In reality, such “national-security-minded” leaders as Dick Cheney and Clinton herself have led the United States into wars that create chaos, inspire enemies and endanger everybody’s national security. Despite the geographically safe position of the United States, it is that bipartisan War Party that has created genuine threats to U.S. national security by prodding the hornets’ nest of religious fanaticism in the Middle East and provoking nuclear-armed Russia by aggressive military exercises right up to its borders.
The basis of Hillary Clinton’s world view is that notorious “American exceptionalism” which Obama has also celebrated.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-comes-out-as-the-war-party-candidate/5529016
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, June 8th, 2016.]
Related:
But she also lied in claiming partial credit for the Iran nuclear deal, which she had tended to block, and most profoundly in presenting herself as a champion of diplomacy. As Secretary of State, she blocked diplomacy that would have prevented or ended conflict, most notoriously concerning Libya, where even senior U.S. military officers were told to cut off their contacts with Gaddafi agents seeking a peaceful compromise.
The Washington Post reported prior to the speech that her campaign “hopes there are many more national-security-minded Republicans and independents who would vote for her, even grudgingly, rather than see Trump win the White House.”
The Washington Post noted that the state of California’s “defense industry and military bases lend a backdrop for her speech.” Indeed! Hillary Clinton is quite simply catering to the military-industrial complex, as she has been doing throughout her career. She is catering to the arms industry, which needs to keep the American people scared of various “threats” in order to continue draining the nation’s wealth into their profitable enterprises. She needs the support of military men and women who believe in all those threats invented by intellectuals in think tanks and editorial offices.
This is the core of the “national-security-minded” electorate that Hillary is targeting. She warned that Trump would jeopardize the wonderful bipartisan foreign policy that has been keeping us great and safe for decades.
In reality, such “national-security-minded” leaders as Dick Cheney and Clinton herself have led the United States into wars that create chaos, inspire enemies and endanger everybody’s national security. Despite the geographically safe position of the United States, it is that bipartisan War Party that has created genuine threats to U.S. national security by prodding the hornets’ nest of religious fanaticism in the Middle East and provoking nuclear-armed Russia by aggressive military exercises right up to its borders.
The basis of Hillary Clinton’s world view is that notorious “American exceptionalism” which Obama has also celebrated.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-comes-out-as-the-war-party-candidate/5529016
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, June 8th, 2016.]
Related:
- Voting for Hillary Clinton? You Must See these Reasons Why YOU SHOULDN'T!
- President Killary: Would the World Survive Hillary Clinton? - Paul Craig Roberts
- Hillary Clinton is a Crook - This is Why People Won't Vote for Her (A Letter to ABC's 7:30 Program)
- Please Don't Vote For Hillary Clinton Just Because She's a Woman. Watch This First. (short version)
- The Clintons' War on Women by Roger Stone & Robert Morrow
- Donald Trump Accuses Bill Clinton of Rape
- TRUMP ROLLS OUT FREE MARKET HEALTHCARE PLAN
- HILLARY CLINTON IS ROLLING IN BIG CASH FROM HER ‘BIG ENEMY’ – BIG PHARMA
- Who Would Hillary Clinton Owe Favors to if Elected?
- Full Breakdown Of The Hillary Clinton Email Scandal
- Hillary Clinton And Her KKK Mentor
- This Video SHOULD Cost Hillary Clinton The Black Vote
- Hillary Clinton Had Bill's Mixed Race Son Banished
- SEX! DRUGS! MURDER! The Secret Lives of Hillary (and Bill) Clinton w/ Victor Thorn
- Is the Clinton Body Count Real? - Hillary (And Bill) The Murder Volume: Part Three of the Clinton Trilogy
- Did Bill Clinton really create 23 million jobs? (Hint: No)
