Tuesday, January 31, 2017
NO TEARS FOR SEN. SCHUMER IN 2015 WHEN HE WAS CALLING FOR REFUGEE BAN
Well, what do we have here!
“The Internet never forgets” is the hard lesson Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer learned on Monday.
As TruthRevolt reported, Schumer gave his Village Voice-heralded acting “magnum opus” when he stood before cameras on Sunday and cried about President Trump’s “mean-spirited and un-American” executive order temporarily stopping the flow of refugees into the United States. But where were those tears in 2015 when Schumer suggested the EXACT SAME THING?
Twitchy noted by digging up the following tweet:
Here’s what he proposed in 2015, according to The Hill:
Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), the third ranking member of the Senate Democratic leadership, on Tuesday said it may be necessary to halt the resettlement of Syrian refugees in the United States.Republicans immediately seized on Schumer’s comment, which breaks with other Democrats who have argued against halting the program.Schumer, however, declined to take the option off the table ahead of a special briefing scheduled for Wednesday afternoon on the process that is now used to vet refugees entering the United States.“We’re waiting for the briefing tomorrow, a pause may be necessary. We’re going to look at it,” he said.
See, a refugee “ban” is a great idea when it comes from Democrats; that’s just pure compassion. But when a Republican suggests it, especially Donald Trump, it’s the most careless, thoughtless, tyrannical, un-Christian thing ever done in history.
Exit thought and winner of today’s Internet goes to 100 Proof:
We must tighten loopholes in the Visa Waiver prgm, ensure passports can’t be faked & stop terrorists who want to exploit the system.
@SenSchumer Loopholes aren't all that are gonna be tightening once you remember this Tweet. #FundamentallyTransformed
Anti-Trump Celebrities Can't Stop FREAKING OUT!
Anti-Trump celebrities are losing their collective mind. The SAG awards showcased just how insane Hollywood elites have become.
Quebec Terror: Blame Trump, Ignore Witnesses
Politi Cringe9 hours ago Sandy Hook reported 2 shooters in military garb, then it was some little kid. Aurora reported multiple shooters in tactical gear, then it was one guy. Quebec reported 2 shooters in masks yelling Allahu Ackbar, then its one guy. Hmm none of those sound familiar at all.
Monday, January 30, 2017
RASMUSSEN POLL: CLEAR MAJORITY OF AMERICANS SUPPORT TRUMP’S TRAVEL BAN
Only 33% oppose block on individuals from terror-linked countries
A new Rasmussen poll finds that 57 per cent of Americans support President Trump’s travel ban on people arriving from terror-linked countries, with just 33 per cent opposing the measure.
Asked if they support a temporary 90 day ban on “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a clear majority of Americans back Trump, despite widespread media criticism of the executive order.
The poll also found that Americans support a visa block on all individuals from those same countries by a margin of 56 per cent to 32 per cent.
The survey has a +/- 3 percentage points margin of error with a 95% level of confidence.
“Most voters opposed former President Obama’s plan to bring tens of thousands of Middle Eastern and African refugees here this year. Sixty-two percent (62%) said Obama’s plan posed an increased national security risk to the United States,” reports Rasmussen.
The poll was conducted before this weekend’s protests, although given the behavior of some of the protesters, it’s unknown whether that would increase or decrease support for the measure amongst Americans.
As we document in the video below, the media has completely misrepresented the issue and whipped up yet more hysteria by characterizing the executive order as a “Muslim ban,” when in fact it is based on a list of countries decided upon by the Obama administration.
In addition, not a single citizen from the top five Muslim-populated countries is affected by the ban. 87% of Muslims worldwide are not affected by the ban.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter:
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.
Investigation: Is Donald Trump A Time Traveler?
Time Traveling Trump and The Mandela Effect - Donald Trump may be time traveler John Titor from 2036:
http://timetravelbabble.blogspot.com/2017/01/time-traveling-trump-and-mandela-effect.html
More Time Travelers Against Trump Evidence?:
http://timetravelbabble.blogspot.com/2016/09/more-time-travelers-against-trump.html
The Truth About Trump's 'Muslim Ban'
It's not a Muslim ban, you virtue signalling morons.
Related:
Donald Trump MUSLIM BAN Demystified In 6 Minutes! - David Seaman
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 31st, 2017.]
Related:
Donald Trump MUSLIM BAN Demystified In 6 Minutes! - David Seaman
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 31st, 2017.]
Did President Trump Just Save Western Civilization?
The mainstream media spent the weekend lying about President Donald Trump instituting a Muslim ban, lying about the contents of the recent executive order, lying about those impacted by the new guidelines and lying about why seven specific countries were included in the travel restrictions.
President Trump was painted as a monster for placing a temporary ban on accepting Syrian refugees - while other world leaders bent over backwards to virtue signal and express their willingness to destabilize their countries.
While the mainstream media, politicians, corporations and Hollywood celebrities were virtue signaling - President Trump made a few phone calls and may have just saved Western Civilization.
President Trump was painted as a monster for placing a temporary ban on accepting Syrian refugees - while other world leaders bent over backwards to virtue signal and express their willingness to destabilize their countries.
While the mainstream media, politicians, corporations and Hollywood celebrities were virtue signaling - President Trump made a few phone calls and may have just saved Western Civilization.
Donald Trump Has Our Full Support, Here's Why
Much to the disappointment of Hollywood and D.C. elites, President Donald Trump has the public's support. Why can't the "other side" acknowledge these very simple points in favor of Donald Trump and his supporters?
Trump Will Defer to Mattis on Torture Ban
In comments that signal a shift away from his talk earlier this week over the US resuming the use of torture on detainees, President Trump today confirmed in comments during a joint conference with British Prime Minister Theresa May, saying he is leaving the torture question up to Defense Secretary James Mattis.
Mattis has made clear his opposition to torture, and his belief that it isn’t effective, and despite Trump once again today insisting he believes torture works, he will defer to Mattis, and Trump says he expects Mattis to keep the ban in place.
This makes the entire discussion over the week about torture, with Trump insisting top intelligence chiefs had assured him torture was a great way to extract information, pretty pointless, as both Mattis and CIA Director Mike Pompeo had made clear their opposition to the practice, and Trump apparently did not intend to overrule them.
http://news.antiwar.com/2017/01/27/trump-will-defer-to-mattis-on-torture-ban/
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 31st, 2017.]
Mattis has made clear his opposition to torture, and his belief that it isn’t effective, and despite Trump once again today insisting he believes torture works, he will defer to Mattis, and Trump says he expects Mattis to keep the ban in place.
This makes the entire discussion over the week about torture, with Trump insisting top intelligence chiefs had assured him torture was a great way to extract information, pretty pointless, as both Mattis and CIA Director Mike Pompeo had made clear their opposition to the practice, and Trump apparently did not intend to overrule them.
http://news.antiwar.com/2017/01/27/trump-will-defer-to-mattis-on-torture-ban/
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, January 31st, 2017.]
Trump “Muslim Ban” Is a Fake News Lie | They Hate Trump More Than Terrorism | Obama Started It All
There is no Muslim Ban, even though the Twitter hashtag #MuslimBan is being used by opponents of the EO. The anti-Trumpers want to stop Trump more than they do terrorism. It’s not a Muslim ban. The order bars all people hailing from Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Those countries were named in a 2016 law concerning immigration visas as “countries of concern.” There is a postponement of entry from 7 countries (Iraq, Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen) previously identified by the Obama administration as posing extraordinary risks. That they are seven majority Muslim countries does not mean there is a Muslim ban, as most of the countries with the largest Muslim populations are not on the list (e.g., Egypt, Indonesia, Malaysia, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Turkey, Nigeria and more). Thus, the overwhelming majority of the Muslim world is not affected.
Friday, January 27, 2017
Left-Wing Media Gave Huge Coverage To March Against Trump, But Completely Blacked Out The March Against Monsanto
The media have been providing an awful lot of coverage on the women’s march against Donald Trump, but they fail miserably to cover other viable protests to their nation’s health. They continue to try and undermine the legitimacy of the Presidency, but that is by design. The owners of the mainstream media are all tied to interests that Trump seems determined to correct, which is why he didn’t want any campaign funding to begin with. (RELATED: See more Donald Trump news at Trump.news)
Trump took to Twitter on Sunday morning to address his displeasure with the protests, but acknowledged peaceful protests ultimately as a good thing. “Watched protests yesterday but was under the impression that we just had an election! Why didn’t these people vote? Celebs hurt cause badly,” Trump initially tweeted. “Peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy. Even if I don’t always agree, I recognize the rights of people to express their views,” followed up Trump.
Hillary Clinton did not participate in the Women’s March on Washington. Hillary Clinton attended the inauguration. By doing so, she sets a shining example, which her followers are unfortunately failing to follow. (RELATED: Find more Clinton news at Clinton.news)
The initial organizers of the march were white women, but they handed leadership over to organizers from New York, who embrace a liberal agenda focusing on workers’ rights, reproductive rights, environmental justice, immigrant rights, and ending violence against women. A group of anti-abortion women also wished to participate in the event, but those activists were excluded. Why would those women be excluded? Well, that’s the left wing for you.
The mainstream media pummeled viewers with news stories claiming nobody was interested in the inauguration, and that everybody was super excited for the march. Nielsen television ratings put Trump’s inauguration as the 2nd highest recorded in 36 years.
Are you marching for a cause, or is the cause marching for you
Neither the protests nor the DisruptJ20 attacks were spontaneous or organic demonstrations. Without the aid of left wing funded organizers, they would have never occurred. We know how fast the left wing works, we’ve seen how quickly ads went up on Craigslist to secure paid protesters after Trump’s election. It’s no surprise that the usual suspects were involved behind the scenes of the march.
The groups that organized the Women’s March on Washington were underwritten by George Soros. He believes that China’s government is superior to the US government. He sees the United States as his biggest obstacle in conquering his globalist agenda. The radical left wing still can’t except the electoral college results, so it’s blatant they don’t respect the constitution.
Asra Q. Nomani wrote in the New York Times “the march really isn’t a ‘women’s march.’ It’s a march for women who are anti-Trump.” Nomani is a lifelong liberal feminist who voted for Trump. Nomani recognized “the funding, politics, and talking points of the some 403 groups that are ‘partners’ of the march,” and discovered George Soros has either funded, or maintains a close relationship with, 56 of those partners. Among the Soros grantees designated as partners were MoveOn, American Civil Liberties Union, Center for Constitutional Rights, Amnesty International, and Human Rights Watch — to name a just a few.
It’s sad to see that Soros has control over so many groups with a designated cause; his cause. We knew Soros was going to be all over the inauguration the day that Trump was elected, we just didn’t know how it would all go down exactly. The ambiance in downtown Washington for the march wasn’t much different from that at the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia last summer, just more of the same anti-police and anti-white radicalism.
Stay informed about more political activism news at NewsTarget.com.
Sources:
[Exposed] Voter fraud uncovered in every state
JANUARY 26, 2017
thehornnews.com
Following President Donald Trump’s declaration Wednesday that he is ordering an investigation into suspicions of widespread voter fraud, the mainstream media has been whipped into a frenzy.
Democratic lawmakers and media talking heads are foaming at the mouth, attacking Trump’s concerns as a debunked myth, a conspiracy theory, a rumor that is unsubstantiated and unfounded.
But they’re not being honest.
There is widespread voter fraud — and it’s happened in your state. The Horn News dug up the proof the media ignoring, and found examples of voter fraud convictions, election investigations, polling irregularities, dead voters, and, yes, entire elections decided by widespread voter fraud.
Here is one example from all 50 states in the union —
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
It has even decided elections — for example, the 1997 mayoral election in Miami was decided by voter fraud, according to The Los Angeles Times.
Is Trump right, and there’s millions of illegal votes deciding national elections? No one knows.
And that’s the problem. It is undeniable that voter fraud happens everywhere in America. It’s not something the media wants to admit, but it’s undeniable.
The good news is, there’s one simple way to put this all to rest to this debate.
One easy way to restore voter confidence in our election system.
Launch a nationwide investigation into these so-called “unsubstantiated” claims by Trump. If there’s no evidence, that’s great news!
If there is evidence, it’s time to take action.
But it is critical to the future of our democracy that the faith in our system be restored.
Only an investigation can do that.
— The Horn editorial team
Related:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)