Trump is Right: September 2019

Monday, September 30, 2019

Hey we know we're trying to impeach you and all, but would you please ban the guns for us?

What An Idiot: Dems Want to Impeach Trump But Schumer Expects Him to Work With Them On Gun Control
Beth Baumann | Sep 30, 2019 8:15 PM
What An Idiot: Dems Want to Impeach Trump But Schumer Expects Him to Work With Them On Gun Control
Source: AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) on Sunday called on President Donald Trump to continue working with Congress on gun control measures despite Democrats' official impeachment inquiry over a call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Specifically, Schumer wants Trump to consider backing universal background checks, a bill known as HR 8 that passed in the House earlier this year.

“Amidst the impeachment inquiry the gears of government can still move. Anyone who suggests otherwise is advancing a false narrative,” Schumer said at his Manhattan office on Sunday, the New York Post reported. “In fact, the best example of governing for this president … would be to pass the universal background bill, which has been sitting on the door step of the Senate for well over 200 days.”

Schumer's call comes after Trump met with National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre last week.

“President Trump must do whatever it takes to resist the clouded comfort he craves from the likes of Wayne LaPierre and the NRA, because it will lead to inaction on one of the single biggest issues Americans want addressed: universal gun background checks,” Schumer said in a statement. “I challenge President Trump today to govern. Allowing the NRA or other nefarious interests to call the shots amid this impeachment inquiry will only backfire on this White House, and the American people will be worse off for it. Congress can still move on major issues while the House impeachment inquiry advances, and it must."

Democrats have focused on pushing universal background checks, which would require a background check to take place for private sales and transfers as well as a ban and "buyback" of so-called "assault weapons."

The reason pro-gun advocates are against universal background checks is because it turns legal, law-abiding gun owners into criminals. If I want to let a friend or family member borrow a rifle for hunting we would have to go to a federal firearms licensee (FFL), he or she would have to go through a background check and the firearm would have to be transferred to their name. And when the gun is to be returned to me, I would have to undergo the same process. We would have to legally transfer firearms, on paper, in order for it to be legal. I couldn't let the person borrow the rifle, even if I know they're law-abiding and not a prohibited possessor.

The same process holds true for a domestic violence survivor who fears for her life. If I let her borrow a firearm for self-protection, without a background check and transfer, we'd both be criminals.

And if we want to take someone new to the range to shoot for the very first time, the same thing would happen. No background check? It's illegal.

But these are the kind of narratives we never hear anything about. They're the unintended consequences that these proposals would have. And, honestly, how many criminals actually go to a gun store and buy a firearm? They don't. They obtain them on the black market. That's not something that can be legislatively fixed. All it does it punish those of us who follow the law.

Advertisement
Around the Web
This IRS Law is Sweeping Local Area
Millennials Don't Like These Brands Anymore and They're Struggling
Federal Program Will Pay Off Your Home If You Live In U.S.
Men, You Don't Need the Blue Pill if You Do This Once Daily

Another hate hoax

Skip to content
Alex Jones' InfoWars
THE ALEX JONES RADIO SHOW
LISTEN NOWWATCH NOW

ANOTHER HATE HOAX: BLACK GIRL WHO CLAIMED WHITE CLASSMATES CALLED HER NAMES, CUT HER DREADS — ADMITS SHE MADE IT ALL UP!
12-year-old claimed she was pinned, called racial slurs by students at school where Vice President Mike Pence’s wife is a teacher
Adan Salazar | Infowars.com - SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 77 Comments
Another Hate Hoax: Black Girl Who Claimed White Classmates Called Her Names, Cut Her Dreads -- Admits She Made it All Up!
A student at a private middle school in Virginia claimed she was targeted for harassment last week by white students who yelled racial slurs and cut her hair.

On Monday, she admitted all those allegations were false.

Police confirmed an investigation was underway last Friday after Amari Allen, 12, told local media that three white boys at the Immanuel Christian School, where Vice President Mike Pence’s wife teaches, pinned her down and assaulted her, calling her “nappy,” and “ugly,” while they covered her mouth and used scissors to snip her dreadlocks.

Local NBC affiliate WRC-TV reported the “heartbreaking story” last Thursday:

Three sixth-grade boys at a Christian school in Northern Virginia pinned down a black classmate and cut off some of her dreadlocks while telling her her hair was “nappy” and “ugly,” she told News4.

Twelve-year-old Amari Allen said the three boys, who she said are white, cut off her hair on Monday. She’s a student at Immanuel Christian School in Springfield, Virginia, where Vice President Mike Pence’s wife, Karen Pence, teaches part-time.

“They said my hair was nappy and I was ugly,” she said.

On Monday, however, Allen’s legal guardians met with school officials before releasing a statement apologizing to the students blamed and saying the whole event was fabricated.

“To those young boys and their parents, we sincerely apologize for the pain and anxiety these allegations have caused,” reads a statement by Allen’s grandparents sent to The Washington Post.

“To the administrators and families of Immanuel Christian School, we are sorry for the damage this incident has done to trust within the school family and the undue scorn it has brought to the school. To the broader community, who rallied in such passionate support for our daughter, we apologize for betraying your trust.”

“We understand there will be consequences and we’re prepared to take responsibility for them,” they added. “We know that it will take time to heal, and we hope and pray that the boys, their families, the school and the broader community will be able to forgive us in time.”

Police would not comment on the investigation to The Post due to juveniles being involved.

Immanuel Christian School Principal Stephen Danish also released a statement confirming the hoax and sympathizing with the “victims and the hurt on both sides of this conflict.”

“We can now confirm that the student who accused three of her classmates of assault has acknowledged that the allegations were false. We’re grateful to the Fairfax County Police Department for their diligent work to investigate these allegations,” Danish wrote.

“While we are relieved to hear the truth and bring the events of the past few days to a close, we also feel tremendous pain for the victims and the hurt on both sides of this conflict. We recognize that we now enter what will be a long season of healing.”

The event was bought hook, line and sinker by the lapdog media which has increasingly green-lighted hate hoaxes in the Trump era, and is reminiscent of the hoax perpetrated by actor Jussie Smollett in Chicago earlier this year, in which he claimed he was assaulted by two white Trump supporters who put a noose around his neck and yelled “MAGA country” while he tried to grab a Subway sandwich in below-freezing Chicago temperatures.

Follow the author on Gab: https://gab.ai/adansalazar

On Twitter: Follow @AdanSalazarWins

On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/adan.salazar.735

On Minds: https://www.minds.com/adan_infowars

With Jussie Smollett’s slap on the wrist, leftists have been given the green light to stage attacks as many times as they want with almost no repercussions until one sticks.

By the way, we’re currently running our biggest sale since Christmas! Get 50% off products with double Patriot Points and free shipping during our Black Friday Comes Early Sale!

WATCH LIVE

RELATED ARTICLES
NY Times Removes Race Context After Black Girl Admits Faking Hate Crime
NY TIMES REMOVES RACE CONTEXT AFTER BLACK GIRL ADMITS FAKING HATE CRIME
U.S. NEWS
Comments
SNL Suggests Assassinating President Trump Instead Of Impeachment
SNL SUGGESTS ASSASSINATING PRESIDENT TRUMP INSTEAD OF IMPEACHMENT
U.S. NEWS
Comments
BUSH-ERA ETHICS LAWYER SAYS TRUMP SHOULDN’T BE ALLOWED TO COMMAND MILITARY AFTER “CIVIL WAR” TWEET
U.S. NEWS
comments
TRUMP SUGGESTS ADAM SCHIFF SHOULD BE ARRESTED FOR TREASON
U.S. NEWS
comments
SAN FRANCISCO RESIDENTS INSTALL ANTI-HOMELESS BOULDERS ON SIDEWALK
U.S. NEWS
comments
COMMENTS

SEARCH
Search for articles

LISTEN TO THE ALEX JONES SHOW – HERE'S HOW
Podcast | Listen | On Demand | Archive
WEEKDAYS 11–3PM AND SUNDAY 4–6PM
How To Get The Banned Infowars Podcasts On Your Smartphone - Find out how to subscribe to our shows!
WATCH LIVE NOW

LATEST STORIES
How to Counter Trump Impeachment
Barr Asks Trump to Reach Out to Other Countries in Criminal Probe of Deep State Coup Ring
Watch: What Happens In Vegas Stays In Vegas
UK Band Massive Attack Flashes Q, Epstein Messages at Concert
Stop The Madness: Blistering GOP Ad Hammers Democrat Insanity
Over 60 Miles of NEW Border Wall Announced
GET INFORMED
Get the latest breaking news & specials from Alex Jones and the Infowars crew.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
hello world
VISIT OUR STORESHOP HERE
COME AND TAKE IT BETO O’ROURKE 2ND AMENDMENT T-SHIRT
Your Price: $29.95
On Sale: $19.95
Beto O'Rourke let Americans know in the third debate he was coming for your guns - send a message back that it won't be that easy!

BUY NOW

LEARN MORE
ILLUSTRATION

Next
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
POLLS
Will Hillary Clinton jump into the 2020 race?

Yes.
No.
God I hope so.
View Results

Radio
Video
NewsWars
PPTV
Store
Infowars Life
T.O.S.
Archive
Advertise
Watch Alex Jones Show
Most Recent
D.M.C.A.
Corrections
About Alex Jones Show
Subscribe
Contact

RADIO SHOW▼
NEWS▼
VIDEOS▼
STORE
BREAKING NEWS
CONTACT▼
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE

White House fights back against deep state efforts to undo 2016 election and rig 2020

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 6:57 AM PT – Monday, September 30, 2019
Trump administration officials are reportedly planning an effort to battle the Democrats’ push for impeachment. The president’s advisers have said they will not leave calls for impeachment unanswered.The”impeachment counter-effort” is reportedly being prepared by acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and White House counsel Pat Cipollone. The plan is expected to focus on the president’s policy achievements and rally his allies, including Steve Bannon.This comes after President Trump has repeatedly called out Democrat Party officials for trying to start a “war” against his cabinet.“We’re fighting to drain the swamp and that’s exactly what I’m doing, and you see why we have to do it because our country is at stake like never before,” stated the president. “It’s all very simple, they’re trying to stop me because I’m fighting for you and I’ll never let that happen.”President Donald Trump walks off of the stage to greet the audience after speaking at the Hispanic Heritage Month Reception in the East Room of the White House in Washington, Friday, Sept. 27, 2019. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)The Trump administration’s plan could be unveiled as soon as Monday. In the meantime, President Trump is continuing to fire back at Democrat attempts to push him out of office. He took to Twitter Sunday to point out that radical-left Democrats are a “do nothing party,” whose policies only hurt America.

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
These Radical Left, Do Nothing Democrats, are doing great harm to our Country. They are lying & cheating like never before in our Country’s history in order to destabilize the United States of America & it’s upcoming 2020 Election. They & the Fake News Media are Dangerous & Bad!

74.2K
7:07 PM - Sep 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
40.8K people are talking about this
Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani said Democrats are trying to deflect from Joe Biden’s corruption in Ukraine.“You don’t you don’t try to create things that aren’t there, there is a record of the conversation,” he explained. “All this time should be spent on the pay-for-play scheme that Biden set up in which he made millions and millions of dollars using his son and having his son sell his office — that should shock you.”FILE – In this May 5, 2018, file photo, Rudy Giuliani, an attorney for President Donald Trump, speaks in Washington. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik, File)

Pope advises caution in field of AI

WATCH TV LIVE
MENU
LIVE
Pope Francis: AI Could Produce 'Barbarism' in Human Activity
Pope Francis: AI Could Produce 'Barbarism' in Human Activity(AP)
By Todd Beamon
Monday, 30 Sep 2019 12:54 PM

Join in the Discussion!

Pope Francis has warned Silicon Valley executives that artificial intelligence and other new technologies could lead to "an unfortunate regression to a form of barbarism" that threatens "all areas of human activity."

"The remarkable developments in the field of technology, in particular those dealing with artificial intelligence, raise increasingly significant implications in all areas of human activity," Pope Francis said last week at a conference featuring technology executives, theologians and academics at the Vatican.

"For this reason, open and concrete discussions on this theme are needed now more than ever," the Pope said, according to Reuters.

In warning of the moral problems that could result from such new technologies, Pope Francis said: "If mankind's so-called technological progress were to become an enemy of the common good, this would lead to an unfortunate regression to a form of barbarism dictated by the law of the strongest."

The conference, held Thursday to Saturday, was entitled "The Common Good in the Digital Age," according to the report.

Among those serving as panelists included Mozilla cofounder and executive chairwoman Mitchell Baker and Gavin Corn, director of Facebook's cyber security law team, Reuters reports.

Vatican officials, according to the report, suggested that the conference could be used for a future papal document on artificial intelligence.

A course in miracles day 27

Lesson 27
Above all else I want to see.
1 Today's idea expresses something stronger than mere determination. It gives vision priority among your desires. You may feel hesitant about using the idea on the ground that you are not sure you really mean it. This does not matter. The purpose of today's exercises is to bring the time when the idea will be wholly true a little nearer.

2 There may be a great temptation to believe that some sort of sacrifice is being asked of you when you say you want to see above all else. If you become uneasy about the lack of reservation involved, add:

3 Vision has no cost to anyone.

4 If fear of loss still persists, add further:

5 It can only bless.

6 The idea for today needs many repetitions for maximum benefit. It should be used at least every half hour, and more often if possible. You might try for every 15 or 20 minutes. It is recommended that you set a definite time interval for using the idea when you wake or shortly afterwards and attempt to adhere to it throughout the day. It will not be difficult to do this, even if you are engaged in conversation or otherwise occupied at the time. You can still repeat one short sentence to yourself without disturbing anything that is going on.

7 The real question is how often will you remember? How much do you want today's idea to be true? Answer one of these questions, and you have answered the other. You will probably miss several applications and perhaps quite a number. Do not be disturbed by this, but do try to keep on your schedule from then on. If only once during the day you feel that you were perfectly sincere while you were repeating today's idea, you can be sure that you have saved yourself many years of effort.

Trump did nothing wrong

Skip to content
Primary Menu
National Review
Search National Review
Search Text
Search
Sep. 30, 2019
SUBSCRIBE

LOGIN
WHITE HOUSE
Why I Think Trump Did Nothing Wrong in His Phone Call with Zelensky
By LUKE THOMPSON
September 29, 2019 6:30 AM

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky meets with President Donald Trump during the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City, September 25, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)
Opponents of the president have elevated his person above his position.
I had a great discussion on The Editors Thursday about my view that President Trump did nothing wrong in his July 25 phone call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. My view seems to be the minority position, so it makes sense to lay it out as clearly as possible.

Much of the confusion around this case stems from the entanglement of two groups specializing in bamboozlement: lawyers and spies. Espionage and the law have specialized argots that hide fabrication and skulduggery. Nonetheless, critical analysis reveals that the call was in bounds and that objections to it reduce to absurdity.

My argument relies on an assertion, a distinction, and showing the absurdity of the other side of the argument taken to its logical conclusions.

First, the assertion: The United States government has a compelling interest in knowing if its private citizens are involved in corruption abroad, either alone or in concert with current, former, or future public officials. This is not a controversial claim, yet when applied to what we know about how Joe Biden conducted his vice presidency in relation to his son Hunter Biden’s career, it invites unwarranted controversy.

Here are the facts. The decision of Joe Biden, while vice president, to facilitate his son Hunter’s international business dealings presents, minimally, the appearance of a conflict of interest. Indeed, anything that Hunter Biden touched that intersected, however tangentially, with the official doings and responsibilities of his father can be presumed to be a worthy subject of investigation unless and until proven otherwise. The younger Biden’s shady dealings with his uncle dating at least to 2008, his absurd (and absurdly lucrative) board post on the Ukrainian energy firm Burisma, his massive financing rounds in China, and his travel to these countries along with his father, the latter acting in his official capacity — all raise major questions.

NOW WATCH: 'Trump Claims He Had 'Nothing to Do' with Pence's Stay at Irish Trump Resort'

Because Hunter Biden repeatedly profited in countries where his father was conducting official business, despite having no marketable skills or relevant experience, these questions would exist even if he were a paragon of personal virtue. Yet we know that he is not. His fiscal profligacy, repeated battles with addiction, and seeming erotomania, make Billy Carter, Hugh Rodham, and Roger Clinton look like Boy Scouts. Indeed, Hunter Biden is recreationally closer to Hunter Thompson than he is to most ne’er-do-well political relatives. Hunter Biden is clearly a person who should not be anywhere near government.

As a result, in the absence of clear and convincing proof that nothing is amiss in the Biden family business, there is a presumptive case for looking into the Bidens to see if all the smoke surrounding Hunter came from fire. Joe Biden didn’t choose to have a troubled son. But he did choose to integrate his troubled son into his official functions. The burden of proving that the interpenetration of government and family did not enrich the younger Biden falls squarely on the elder Biden. He has not met that burden because, given the facts already known, doing so is probably impossible.

Joe Biden wishes to be president. The American people have a right to know if, as second in line to the presidency, he facilitated his family’s enrichment. Did he do so consciously or through blind irresponsibility? He flew Hunter Biden to China on an official visit: What did Joe think Hunter was doing on that trip? If nothing is amiss, follow the administration’s response to this scandal and open the books. Until that happens, an investigation — whether formal or informal — is justified.

Second, my distinction: Information is not interference. Based on the call transcript, Trump asked Zelensky to get to the bottom of whether Ukraine or Ukrainians interfered in the 2016 election. One may consider Trump’s concerns absurd or silly. Alternatively, one may suspect Ukrainian involvement. I do not know and will not pretend to know, because whether Ukraine was actually involved is irrelevant. The request for information that the Ukrainian president may be uniquely positioned to offer is fair and does not, in and of itself, constitute election interference.

The president is well within his rights to seek information from his counterparts abroad. He can ask Zelensky if the Dodgers will make the World Series, or who Zelensky thinks is the most formidable Democratic candidate. Soliciting information, in the form of facts or opinion, does not constitute election interference. It does not constitute having a foreign head of state do opposition research for the Trump campaign. It is not some of in-kind contribution.

Nor is there anything wrong with the president using leverage to get answers to his questions. Ukraine is not in NATO. Ukraine has been an ally of the United States some of the time, but at other times has been a de facto extension of the Russian Federation. And while the United States owes Ukraine certain obligations owing to the Budapest Memorandum, obligations the last administration ignored, Ukraine does not enjoy a constitutional or treaty right to Javelin missiles. Regardless of whether or not Trump asks important questions or stupid ones, by virtue of his office, he has the right to ask what he wants and use the leverage he controls to get answers. Because the national interest is served by those questions, even if they also align with Trump’s perceived political self-interest, a quid pro quo is not a problem.

While the seeking of information does not intrinsically constitute a problem — indeed, it’s exactly the sort of thing we want the president doing in exchanges with foreign heads of state — what Trump chooses to do with the information he receives matters immensely. Were Trump to pass documents to his campaign, that would blend his official powers with his electioneering apparatus, which is against campaign-finance law. Were Trump to tell Zelensky to leak whatever damaging information he might find about Biden, that too would constitute election interference. Obviously, if Trump asked Zelensky to target Biden or his campaign with hacking, it would be a crime. If he asked Zelensky to fabricate information and leak it to the public, this impeachment talk would be completely justified.

Yet Trump did not do these things. He asked for information that might help him serve the national interest in his capacity as president. Whether one trusts Trump to act accordingly or not is not itself impeachable in the absence of action. Similarly, that Trump failed to follow up regarding his invocation of Attorney General Barr is neither a problem nor surprising given his lackluster organizational tendencies.

But what if we were to treat the request for information as tantamount to interference? Let us trace this line of thinking to its absurd conclusion. If Trump cannot ask anyone, foreign or domestic, about the obviously dubious behavior of a political rival, then we have created a de facto immunity for anybody running for president, an immunity that extends to their family if they mix family with previous public-office holding. So long as American officials and private citizens misbehave abroad and then run for president, they cannot be investigated legitimately, so this line of thinking goes.

As a historical matter, this would mean that the Benghazi and Clinton Foundation investigations undertaken by Congress were illegitimate the day they began because they had political consequences for presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. They would similarly mean that the Russiagate investigation was wrong the day it began. And while many people can justifiably point to misbehavior by Russiagate investigators, it cannot reasonably be said that Donald Trump’s words, deeds, and associates made that investigation unreasonable from the get-go. Indeed, we can go still further back.

Going back further still, if targeting a political opponent for investigation is illegitimate under any circumstances, then FDR was wrong to direct the FBI to work with friendly European governments to investigate Charles Lindbergh and the German American Bund.

Clearly, creating an effective blanket immunity for those powerful enough to run for president is truly the stuff of banana republics. Indeed, if it achieved anything, it would only encourage well-heeled rascals to run for office while simultaneously encouraging the politically connected to engage in international graft. I, for one, think America has enough of both already.

Finally, I would like to close with two observations. Neither is logically necessary to my argument, but both are sociologically and constitutionally worth examining. Many people are uncomfortable with the president leveraging America’s superior power to extract concessions from an inferior. I question this instinct. Power involves coercion and brokering. It can look and feel gross. It can be smutty. We have two and a half millennia of political philosophy in large part because goodness and political effectiveness have a complicated relationship. People can be bad and ineffective, yes. The good guys sometimes win too. But politics at the highest level has long been recognized as sitting in an awkward relationship to morality.

As a result, politics isn’t for everybody. Though we misattribute the idiom to Bismarck, Americans have long understood that people prefer to eat sausage rather than see it get made. The Framers of the Constitution, who expected to be the weaker party — to be in Zelensky’s position rather than Trump’s — understood this. That’s why Article II, Section 2 gives the president the power to negotiate treaties. Those treaties come into effect only when ratified by the Senate, so the conclusion of a deal is subject to popular review. However, the back-and-forth required to get that deal is and should remain a solely presidential power. If anything, the White House was too quick to disclose the transcript of Trump’s call with Zelensky.

None of this guarantees that wrongdoing has not transpired. If President Trump overstepped in the ways outlined above, I will happily revisit my opposition to impeachment. The president is entitled to designate a special representative to serve as his proxy in negotiations or fact-finding, including a personal attorney with whom he enjoys attorney–client privilege over and above traditional executive privilege. However, these powers stop the minute the president directs his subordinate to go beyond information-gathering and to engage in campaigning. And if a subordinate does so of his own volition, that subordinate ought to be punished. However, nothing we have seen to date crosses these lines. Instead, opponents of the president have elevated his person above his position, deciding that the practice of executive power itself is illegitimate because of who has been elected to wield it. That is the very kind of institutional nihilism many of these same people claim to fear most about this presidency.

159

LUKE THOMPSON — Mr. Thompson is a Republican political consultant. @ltthompso
MORE IN WHITE HOUSE
How about a Bipartisan Treaty against the Criminalization of Elections?
Trump Did It, but Should He Be Impeached?
Prince Don
Rudy Giuliani’s Harebrained Scheme
RECOMMENDED ARTICLES
The Resistance Failed
CONRAD BLACK
Joe Biden vs. the Democratic Economy Truthers
JOHN HIRSCHAUER
One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders
KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON
Man of Steel
MONA CHAREN
SPONSORED CONTENT
Hate Shaving? Check out This Beauty Find You Can Get at Your Local Drugstore
Hate Shaving? Check out This Beauty…
ELLE.com
Help defenseless animals for 63¢ a…
ASPCA
[Photos] Locals See Wolf Approaching Dog In Park, Then The Unexpected Happens
[Photos] Locals See Wolf Approaching…
PostFun
If You Have an Android, This Star Trek Game is Highly Addictive
If You Have an Android, This Star…
Download Star Trek Fleet Command
Cartoons of the Day: September 26, 2019
Cartoons of the Day: September 26, 2019
Cartoons of the Day: September 26, 2019
The worst places to vacation in America (Stay far away from No. 8)
The worst places to vacation in America (Stay far away from No. 8)
ALOT Travel
Refi your student loans before rates go up.
Refi your student loans before rates go up.
NerdWallet
Does Trump Understand Corruption?
Does Trump Understand Corruption?
Does Trump Understand Corruption?
Tattoo Fails: Try Not To Laugh Hard
Tattoo Fails: Try Not To Laugh Hard
Offbeat
The War-Time Diaries of Miksa Fenyő: A Little-Known Masterpiece
The War-Time Diaries of Miksa Fenyő: A Little-Known Masterpiece
The War-Time Diaries of Miksa Fenyő: A Little-Known Masterpiece
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
Here's What New Dental Implants Should Cost in 2019
Here's What New Dental Implants Should Cost in 2019
realtimeclk.com
Notes from the Class of 1987
Notes from the Class of 1987
Notes from the Class of 1987
Help defenseless animals for 63¢ a day.
ASPCA
PROMOTED POSTS

Johns Hopkins Professor On Child Transgender Trend: ‘Many Regret'
thecollegefix.com

Oberlin College Could Have Paid $1 Instead Of $25 Million In Suit
thecollegefix.com

Student Leaders Fight ‘Heteronormativity’ At Notre Dame
thecollegefix.com

Birds Of Prey Reshoots To Remove Lewd Storyline
boundingintocomics.com
MOST POPULAR

LAW & THE COURTS
Once Again, Progressive Anti-Christian Bigotry Carries a Steep Legal Cost
By DAVID FRENCH

CULTURE
On Shooting a Wild Hog: An Uneasy Hunter Brings Home the Bacon
By JORDAN SILLARS

VIDEO
Five Cops Were Arrested in Relation to Stormy Daniels’ Arrest

WHITE HOUSE
Trump Did It, but Should He Be Impeached?
By JONAH GOLDBERG

WHITE HOUSE
Why the Impeachment Frenzy May Only Strengthen Trump
By VICTOR DAVIS HANSON

WHITE HOUSE
Prince Don
By KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON

WHITE HOUSE
The Impeachment Train
By YUVAL LEVIN

U.S.
The Radicalism Arms Race
By KEVIN D. WILLIAMSON

WORLD
Double Standards on Ukraine
By ANDREW C. MCCARTHY

WHITE HOUSE
Plurality of Americans Support Impeaching Trump
By ALEXANDRA DESANCTIS

VIEW MORE
LOGIN
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
Sections
The Corner
Bench Memos
The Morning Jolt
The G-File
News
Books, Arts & Manners
All Articles
All Authors
Podcasts
Photos
Games
Videos
Topics
Politics & Policy
Culture
White House
Film & TV
PC Culture
U.S.
World
Immigration
Economy & Business
Elections
Magazine
Latest Issue
Archive
Subscribe
Gve NR as a Gift
Customer Care
NRPLUS
Magazine FAQ
NRPLUS FAQ
About
Frequently Asked Questions
The Masthead
Contact Us
Careers
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
NR Institute
More
Advertise
Donate
Search
E-mails & Alerts
Newsletters

Morning Jolt (M-F)
NR Daily (M-Sa)
Breaking News (M-Su)
Email
© 2019 National Review

Loading...
60% Off for One Day Only

Sunday, September 29, 2019

Oh brother: Schiff admits there was no quid pro quo but still believes in impeachment

Oh, Brother: Schiff Admits There Was No Quid Pro Quo But Still Believes In Impeachment
Beth Baumann | Sep 29, 2019 4:15 PM

Oh, Brother: Schiff Admits There Was No Quid Pro Quo But Still Believes In Impeachment
Source: AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) told George Stephanopoulos that his Committee plans to hold President Donald Trump accountable for his phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Although the unclassified, unredacted transcript showed that no pro quo took place, Schiff believes impeachment is still necessary. He believes Trump failed to protect America's elections.

"I intend to hold the president accountable and I intend to do it with our own investigation. And what we have seen already is damning because what we have seen in that call record is a president of the United States using the full weight of his office, with a country behold to America for its defense, even as Russian troops occupy part of its land, and the president used that opportunity to try to coerce that leader to manufacture dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election," he said.

"It's hard to imagine a series of facts more damning than that. So yes, we're going to get to the bottom of it."

"Let me stop you right there because we're already hearing some of the president's defenders, even those who sometimes say the call was not appropriate, say yes, that in the absence of an explicit quid pro quo, some kind of statement from the president or a document that says, 'We are withholding the aid until you do that investigation.' That is what is necessary to pursue impeachment," Stephanopoulos said. "That explicit quid pro quo. What's your response to that?"

"Well, that's nonsense," Schiff replied. "It is an illegal, improper violation of oath, a violation of his duty to defend our elections and our Constitution, for the president to merely ask for foreign interference in our elections. That is enough that our president said, 'I want you to do us a favor' and though he added immediately after the Ukraine president talked about the need to get more javelins and more weapons to defend against Russia, so we don't have to show a quid pro quo, although this conversation comes awfully close."

According to Schiff, it's important to note that Trump had the conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "at a time when the president is withholding hundreds of millions of dollars to Ukraine."

"The Ukrainian people and their president are not stupid," Schiff explained. "And neither are the American people. And they can see and understand and appreciate a shakedown when they see it going down and that's exactly what this was."

Adam Schiff
✔
@RepAdamSchiff
We’ll conduct a complete investigation to hold this president accountable.

But what we’ve already seen in his call is damning.

Trump tried to coerce a foreign leader to make up dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election.

Violating his oath and undermining our security.

Embedded video
19.2K
2:00 PM - Sep 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
7,833 people are talking about this
We’ll conduct a complete investigation to hold this president accountable.

But what we’ve already seen in his call is damning.

Trump tried to coerce a foreign leader to make up dirt on his opponent and interfere in our election.

Violating his oath and undermining our security. pic.twitter.com/iHTXPw9zmI

— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) September 29, 2019

Advertisement
Around the Web
Millennials Don't Like These Brands Anymore and They're Struggling
Men, You Don't Need the Blue Pill if You Do This Once Daily
Casinos Don't Expect You to Do This but They Can't Stop You
Little Known Federal Program Pays You $350/monthly To Payout Your Home
Recommended from Townhall

AF Branco Political Cartoons – Political Humor, Jokes, and Pictures Updated Daily ~ September 27, 2019 - 168539

If The Case For Trump’s Impeachment Is So Strong, Why Are Liberals Lying About It?

Bob Gorrell Political Cartoons – Political Humor, Jokes, and Pictures Updated Daily ~ September 24, 2019 - 168433

Geraldo Rivera Has An Idea Of Whose 'Dirty Hands' Are Behind Whistleblower Complaint

Political Cartoons - Political Humor, Jokes and Pictures

DeNiro don't need no facts or actual arguments. He's a tough guy and expert at curse words and ad hominem attacks

NEWS SEPTEMBER 29, 2019
'F**k em': Robert De Niro unleashes expletive-filled rant against Trump-supporting Fox News critics
'This guy is crazy. We gotta get him out'
Image source: YouTube screenshot
CHRIS ENLOE
Legendary actor Robert De Niro had a harsh words Sunday for Trump-supporting critics on Fox News.

Ditch the fake news ==> Click here to get news you can trust sent right to your inbox. It's free!
"F**k em, f**k em," De Niro said on CNN's "Reliable Sources."

De Niro's comments came in response to host Brian Stelter, who asked De Niro why he has decided to engage in vulgar language when criticizing the president.

The CNN host then asked his question again after reminding De Niro his comments did not violate FCC rules.

"We are in a moment in our lives in this country where this guy is like a gangster. He's come along, and he's said things, done things. We say over and over again, 'This is terrible, we're in a terrible situation, we're in a terrible situation.' And this guy just keeps going on and on and on without being stopped," De Niro said.

Earlier in the interview, De Niro called Trump "crazy."

"This guy is crazy. We gotta get him out," De Niro said. "He's been worse than I ever could have imagined."

Daily News Highlights
Get the news that matters most delivered directly to your inbox.
Your email
GET IMPORTANT NEWS

No whitsleblower, just a leaker, US in cold civil war

×
Rush Limbaugh
For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Download
Now
THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW MAIN MENU

There Is No Whistleblower, Just a Leaker! We’re in the Midst of a Cold Civil War
Sep 27, 2019

RUSH: There really is no whistleblower. This is just a leaker who followed procedures that have been established to give whistleblowers protection.

The whole thing is a sham. It’s nothing more than the Steele dossier 2.0, as I have been saying all week. A couple people now have come to this conclusion. It’s the same people, it’s the same scam, it’s the same objective, and I’m gonna add a name to potential Democrat presidential nominees coming up soon.

JOHNNY DONOVAN: And now, from sunny South Florida, it’s Open Line Friday!

RUSH: Bottom line, there isn’t anything really new here. This is just the next phase of “Get Trump.” This is the next phase of the operation to overturn the election results of 2016. It’s the same players, it’s the same technique, it’s the same play. The whistleblower report, it was probably prepared with the assistance of House Intelligence Committee staffers.

Nothing about this is genuine. There’s no real whistleblower who’s terribly alarmed and upset over what Trump said in a phone call. The whistleblower didn’t even hear it. It’s just the next phase. It’s the same play run to the different side of the line. Let’s put it that way. And the whistleblower report is the Steele dossier all over again. Some people think that it is the same technique with Christine Blasey Ford. But that whole thing was an extension of the original play.

What is this really all about? What is this really, really all about? It’s all about overturning the election results of 2016. Why is that so important? It goes beyond just the fact that the deep state lost. I think what it’s about is what I have long thought it’s about. It’s about making sure the American people do not learn the extent of the corruption in the Obama administration and the Democrat Party at large, and particularly among these people in the deep state who did what they did to deny Trump his election victory.

And that’s why Pelosi’s out there today saying that Bill Barr has gone rogue. If you need any evidence that they scared to death of what Barr and his team are investigating as to the origins of all of this, Pelosi out of the blue saying that Barr has gone rogue, they are doing everything they can to destroy everybody on the other side of this.

There’s nothing that’s true. You know what really is hard about this is that we’re dealing with nothing but a series of abject lies. Everybody on the left is lying. Every allegation about this is a lie. Trump hasn’t broken any laws. Trump has not engaged in any corruption. In fact, Trump is the most investigated president in the history of the country, and they still haven’t found a crime! They’re still looking for a crime. They haven’t found a crime, so they’re making things up.

The media is not media. It’s just Democrats who work in the media, and the whole group of ’em is aligned. And what we are in the middle of now, folks, is a Cold Civil War. It has begun. It is a Cold Civil War as opposed to hot. There’s no hostilities declared. There’s no two clear sides of this. And certainly no shots have been fired. But nevertheless we’re in the midst of a Cold Civil War, and it encompasses a lot of things.

It encompasses overturn the election results of 2016, it is about protecting and defending the deep state, the Washington establishment going forward. Their careers, their fortunes, their corruption. There are terribly big stakes involved here for these people. And Trump is on the cusp of overturning it and exposing it. They cannot allow that to happen.

Now, I’ve had a number of people mention this to me as well, so this is not an original thought of mine. But as I’ve thought about it, it makes perfect sense.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: On this whistleblower story, there isn’t a whistleblower! Just like there wasn’t a dossier. Not a real one. It was manufactured political opposition research. This whistleblower report is manufactured political opposition research. The lies are impossible to keep up with. Eric Swalwell was on Fox this morning saying, “Well, the president’s confessed.”

Confessed? What’s the president confessed to?

“Well, he’s confessed to trying to hide the information in the whistleblower report!”

The president hasn’t confessed. What did Adam Schiff do yesterday? Adam Schiff goes up as the chairman of the committee and says that the president called the president of Ukraine and ordered him, “Dig up dirt, lots of it — and don’t call me back until you get it — on Joe Biden.” That didn’t happen. Trump hasn’t done anything they are accusing him of doing. Swalwell, after saying that Trump had confessed, then pointed out that, “Well, look what Trump did. Trump took the transcript of the phone call and he put it over here in this secure area.

“He’s clearly hiding it. That’s a political move. The president’s ashamed. It’s the same as confessing that he’s guilty. We must move forward with impeachment.” There’s no confession! Trump has confessed to nothing. Trump hasn’t done anything! Trump has committed no impeachable offense. He has committed no illegal act. They didn’t find a single thing! Yet they lie through their teeth. This sequestering of the transcript of the call into a private, secure area? Let’s call it “the secure enclave” just to be different. Do you know they’ve been doing that for two years?

It’s not tied to this transcript. It has nothing to do with this call. And do you know why transcripts and other records of presidential conversations involving Trump are sent over to the secure enclave? Because they’ve got a leak problem! Because they’ve got some deep state, administrative state traitors in there who were opposed to Trump, who are leaking like sieves, and so they’re sequestering this stuff for the sake of national security!

They’re not hiding it for political reasons! They’re trying to protect it! They’re trying to protect the integrity of presidential conversations and everything that they entail. But here’s Eric Swalwell today lying through his teeth saying, “Trump has confessed.” “The attorney general, Bill Barr, has gone rogue. We must speed up the impeachment process.” There is no whistleblower. There was no legitimate Steele dossier.

All we have is a deep state leaker probably related in some way to John Brennan. The New York Times already outed the guy as a disgruntled CIA person, and the guy simply leaks a bunch of stuff, has his report written with the assistance of staffers on the Democrat side on the House Intelligence Committee, and calls himself a “whistleblower” for the protections that it offers! You watch. Every other future leak of major consequence like this is all of a sudden gonna be called “whistleblower” because of the statutory protections that are granted to whistleblowers.

I can’t emphasize enough that there isn’t anything real about any of this like there wasn’t anything real in Trump-Russia collusion. Let me clarify. There was a lot real in Trump-Russia collusion, but it was all the things committed by Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Obama, McCabe, Strzok Smirk, and that whole cast of characters. That was real. That effort to undermine Trump — to spy on Trump, to get the election result overturned — all of that stuff was real.

The things they were alleging Trump did, none of it happened. They’re still lying about the Mueller report. Democrats are out there saying the Mueller report proves that Trump colluded, 16 different times now. No, it doesn’t. It doesn’t say that at all. The Mueller report concludes that there wasn’t any collusion between Trump and Russia. But the Mueller report was written as a pre-impeachment document anyway. The Mueller report was written to be used as it is.

It was written with all the footnotes and the careful sentence structure to be able to be cited the way the Democrats are citing it. “Robert Mueller found collusion 16 different times!” No, he didn’t. “Well, right there it is: The president probably… The president might have this and that… Somebody here said…” It’s nothing but hearsay. There’s nothing. But the sheer power of the ruling class is what is on display here, and their literal panic and fright over having it all upended.

Related Links
RushLimbaugh.com: Democrats in Media and Democrats in Politics Collude to Create Another Fake Scandal! - 09.26.19
The Federalist: Complaint From So-Called ‘Whistleblower’ Is Riddled With Gossip, Blatant Falsehoods - Sean Davis
HotAir: Pro Tip From Pelosi: Barr’s Gone Rogue
Washington Examiner: 2020 Race Flip: Trump 47%, Biden 43%
ARCHIVES CALENDAR

Judicial watch Sue's for documents on Biden forcing firing of Ukrainian prosecutor

SUBSCRIBE
2 Comments
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden greets guests at the Polk County Democrats' Steak Fry on Sept. 21, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden greets guests at the Polk County Democrats' Steak Fry on Sept. 21, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)MORE
POLITICS
Judicial Watch Sues for Documents on Biden Forcing Firing of Ukraine Prosecutor
BY MARK TAPSCOTT
September 26, 2019 Updated: September 26, 2019
WASHINGTON—Judicial Watch announced Sept. 26 that it has filed suit in federal court seeking to force the State Department to release all official U.S. government documents related to the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor, as demanded by former Vice President Joe Biden.

ADVERTISING

The nonprofit government watchdog’s suit was in response to the government’s failure to respond to a May 7 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for:

Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to Viktor Shokin’s investigation of Mykola Zolchevsky, and Shokin’s resignation at Ukraine’s Prosecutor General.
Any and all records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the Department of State and any official, employee, or representative of the Office of the Vice President regarding Shokin.
Postal records confirmed that the Office of Programs and Information Services, which handles FOIA requests sent to the State Department, received the Judicial Watch request. The department didn’t respond within the time limits set by federal law, according to Judicial Watch.

The FOIA was filed after a video became public of Biden telling a Jan. 23, 2018, conference at the Council on Foreign Relations of his threatening to withhold more than $1 billion in U.S. assistance to the government of Ukraine if officials didn’t fire Shokin before Biden departed the country in six hours.

Shokin was at the time conducting a corruption investigation of Burisma, a Ukraine energy company that was paying Biden’s son, Hunter, $50,000 a month in consulting fees, according to media reports.

“I remember going over and convincing our team that we should be providing loan guarantees, and I went over to Kyiv for, I guess, the 12th or 13th time, and I was supposed to announce there was another $1 billion loan guarantee,” Biden told the conference.

“And I had gotten a commitment from [then-Ukraine President Petro] Poroshenko and [then-Ukraine Prime Minister Arseniy] Yatsenyuk that they would take action against [Shokin], and they didn’t.

“So they were walking out to the press conference, and I said, ‘We’re not gonna give you the billion dollars.’ They said, ‘You have no authority, you’re not the president.’ The president said, I said, ‘Call him.’

“I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars, and I’m leaving here, I believe, in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’

“Well, son of a …, the prosecutor got fired.”

The Judicial Watch lawsuit for the Biden records was announced the same day as acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire testified before the House Select Committee on Intelligence concerning his handling of a complaint filed by an anonymous federal worker described by the news media as a “whistleblower.”

The complaint was given to the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (IGIC). It claimed President Donald Trump threatened in a July 25 telephone call to cut off U.S. military assistance if Ukraine’s then-newly elected President Volodymyr Zelensky didn’t reopen the investigation of Burisma and Hunter Biden. The complaint also claimed White House aides tried to hide call records.

Trump released the official transcript of the call Sept. 25, calling it “a nothing call,” and denying any wrongdoing in the conversation with Zelensky.

Maguire received the complaint from the IGIC, concluded it was “credible,” and gave it to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel reviewed it and concluded the allegations in the complaint failed to meet the legal definition of an “urgent concern” in the federal whistleblower protection statute and warranted no further action.

The unidentified individual who filed the complaint acknowledged that he or she did not actually hear the president’s call to Zelensky, but only learned about it secondhand from half-a-dozen White House officials. The IGIC also said there were “indicia of an arguable political bias” against Trump in the complaint.

Congressional Democrats insist Trump’s alleged threat is an impeachable crime and are moving forward with multiple investigations they claim will determine whether formal articles of impeachment should be filed in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the ranking minority member of the intelligence panel, told the Maguire hearing, “What we have with this storyline is another Steele dossier. … In the Democrats’ mania to overturn the 2016 elections, everything they touch gets hopelessly politicized.”

The Steele dossier is the discredited document that was investigated in the two-year probe, which found no Trump/Russia collusion. The dossier had been paid for by Trump’s 2016 opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

Contact Mark Tapscott at mark.tapscott@epochtimes.nyc

Share
RECOMMENDED

LANGUAGES
English
Chinese
Spanish
Hebrew
Japanese
Korean
Indonesian
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Swedish
Dutch
Russian
Ukrainian
Romanian
Czech
Slovak
Polish
Turkish
Persian
Subscribe Advertise About Us Contact Us RSS Feeds Terms of Services Privacy Policy Copyright Policy
@ COPYRIGHT 2000 - 2019

Impeachment is treasonous communist coup attemp

Trump News
Search
Search
‘Impeachment’ is nothing less than a full-scale Communist coup attempt by treasonous Democrats who long ago sold out America and the American people for Globalism
09/27/2019 / By News Editors

In an excellent new story over at CD Media titled “If You Were The Dem Organized Crime Family And About To Be Prosecuted For An Illegal Coup, What Would You Do?” that Whatfinger News had linked to on Wednesday, author L. Todd Wood, a graduate of the U.S. Air Force Academy who flew special operations helicopters supporting SEAL Team 6 and Delta Force, argues that criminal Democrats and their enablers within the mainstream media know what is coming and, desperate beyond words, their doomed-to-fail impeachment attempt of President Trump might be the only way to get them out of the huge mess that they are in.

(Article by Stefan Stanford republished from AllNewsPipeline.com)

With Susan Duclos reporting in this story on ANP on Wednesday that ‘the beginning of the end‘ talk being babbled about by Democrats again in their drive to take down President Trump echoes that which they’ve been babbling on now about for nearly 3 years since President Trump took office, even House Democrat Jeff Van Drew knows that “at the end of the day, all we’re going to have is a failed impeachment“.

Yet as Tom Luongo so perfectly points out in this new story republished at Zero Hedge titled “The Coup Has Begun – The Empire Strikes Back Everywhere“, there are no coincidences in politics. Everything happens on a particular schedule. So when I see a day as crazy as today I have to ask the question, “Why this, why now?”

And as we see in his story, what’s happening politically is by no means just regional here in America – it’s happening all around the world, helping to prove the ‘global nature‘ of ‘globalism‘ and the fact that the globalists are ‘digging in‘ at a time when President Trump just ‘blistered‘ socialism and globalism at the United Nations. From Luongo’s story.:

Look at the headlines and you’ll see what I’m talking about. All of these things happened since I woke up at 7:30am Monday morning in Florida:

The British Supreme Court just arrogated unprecedented power to itself by inserting itself into any dispute between the Government and Parliament. This upends more than 300 years of constitutional process.

The Democrats have announced they will pursue impeachment charges against President Trump because an unverified, hearsay whistleblower made a complaint about a phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenski. Impeachment odds soared overnight as someone was tipped off about the Democrats’ plan.

Bitcoin’s hashrate mysteriously flash-crashed more than 40% presaging a massive $1500 drop in price.

Donald Trump delivered a blistering critique of socialism at the United Nations General Assembly. Too bad he’s nearly as bad as the ones he’s fighting on the far left.

Europe’s Trio of Faded Glory — The UK, France and Germany — joined in the chorus of unverified condemnation of Iran in the attack on the Saudi oil field on the 14th.

The Federal Reserve continues to bail out banks to the tune of $65 to $75 billion per day through overnight repo operations that no one can give us an explanation as to why they’re needed.

This feels to me like a multi-level coup against those that dare stand athwart the global power structure. Both British and American leadership institutions are under sincere attack with these moves.

As we’ll explore in the rest of this ANP story, with everything else that we’ve been watching unfolding in America over the past decade+, one could easily argue that what we’ve been witnessing over the past several years since President Trump was voted into office has been a full-scale Communist coup attempt with Democrats and globalists never, ever believing that Hillary Clinton would lose in 2016 and their beliefs they’d be ‘protected’ from their crimes of treason and completely selling out America and the American people forever.

As ‘Doomer Doug‘ reported in this recent story titled “If Treason Prosper, Then None Dare Call It Treason“, the final gasps of the attempted ‘coup d’etat‘ to remove President Trump are now underway with Doug warning in his story that the end results of this could be complete chaos and anarchy in America, potentially leading to Civil War with Democrats insanely still believing they can do no wrong while attempting to overthrow the results of the US election for more than 2 years running now with the ‘coup attempt‘ led by people such as Communist-voting John Brennan.

Saturday, September 28, 2019

Joker Movie Exposes SJW Hypocrisy

Joker Movie Exposes SJW Hypocrisy

https://batmanparodyhub.blogspot.com

The Fans Are Winning - George Lucas Hates Disney's Star Wars!

What are the chances we will see those outlines? Disney should have at least done those fairly close and then went wherever they wanted. He deserved that much to say the least.

The Fans Are Winning - George Lucas Hates Disney's Star Wars!

https://batmanparodyhub.blogspot.com

Trump slams impeachment scam and touts admin achievements

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 3:20 PM PT – Sat. September 28, 2019
President Trump is doubling down on his phone call with his Ukrainian counterpart, and slams ongoing impeachment efforts by the Left.President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the InterContinental Barclay New York hotel during the United Nations General Assembly, Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019, in New York. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)In a pair of tweets Saturday evening, the president questions how the U.S. would impeach a leader, who has created the greatest economy in the history of the U.S. and rebuilt the nation’s military.He also touts the tax cuts and jobs act, as well as fixing the department of Veterans affairs.In a follow up tweet, President Trump said, Volodymyr Zelenskiy told the media he wasn’t pressured to investigate the Biden family, in any way shape or form.President Trump also said, his Ukrainian counterpart’s dismissal of the allegations should bring an end to the latest witch hunt, adding that the others “ended in ashes.”

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
· 4h
How do you impeach a President who has created the greatest Economy in the history of our Country, entirely rebuilt our Military into the most powerful it has ever been, Cut Record Taxes & Regulations, fixed the VA & gotten Choice for our Vets (after 45 years), & so much more?...

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
....The conversation with the new and very good Ukraine President, who told the Fake News, at the United Nations, that HE WAS NOT PRESSURED BY ME IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, should by and of itself bring an end to the new and most recent Witch Hunt. Others ended in ashes!

38.7K
6:00 PM - Sep 28, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
16.9K people are talking about this

Ruby Rose Attacks Men Because Everyone Hates Batwoman

Ruby Rose Attacks Men Because Everyone Hates Batwoman

https://batmanparodyhub.blogspot.com/

Meet Their New Leader!

Meet Their New Leader!

Debunking Potholer54 and Global Warming/Climate Change Propaganda:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2018/02/debunking-potholer54-and-global.html

The RNC Just Released Its First Impeachment-Centered Campaign Ad

The RNC Just Released Its First Impeachment-Centered Campaign Ad Have the Democrats stepped in it with their hasty impeachment threat for President Trump? The Republican National Committee is banking on it, because it's just released its first campaign ad exposing the Democrats' "impeachment charade."
Townhall

Dossier 2.0: ‘Whistleblower’ Complaint Relies on Soros-Funded ‘Investigative Reporting’ Group

Dossier 2.0: ‘Whistleblower’ Complaint Relies on Soros-Funded ‘Investigative Reporting’ Group Sections of a so-called whistleblower’s complaint alleging President Donald Trump was “using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country” in the 2020 presidential race relies upon a self-described investigative journalism organization bankrolled massively by billionaire activist George Soros. Breitbart

Warren Financially Benefited from Private Prisons Despite Claiming They Are ‘Profiteering off Cruelty’

Warren Financially Benefited from Private Prisons Despite Claiming They Are ‘Profiteering off Cruelty’ Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) benefited financially from the existence of private prisons despite vowing to ban them on the grounds that they are “profiteering off cruelty,” a report from the Washington Free Beacon revealed. Breitbart

https://pocahontas2020.blogspot.com/

Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge

Intel Community Secretly Gutted Requirement Of First-Hand Whistleblower Knowledge The intelligence community secretly eliminated a requirement that whistleblowers provide direct, first-hand knowledge of alleged wrongdoings, raising questions about the intelligence community’s behavior regarding the August submission of a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump The Federalist

Schiff: ‘Everyone Understood’ ‘I Was Mocking the President’s Conduct’ in My Opening

Schiff: ‘Everyone Understood’ ‘I Was Mocking the President’s Conduct’ in My Opening On Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Situation Room,” House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA) stated that he didn’t regret his “parody” of the Trump-Ukraine call and argued that everyone understood “that I was mocking the president’s conduct.” Beitbart

50,000 New Trump Donors the Past 72 Hours - $15 Million Raised

50,000 New Trump Donors the Past 72 Hours - $15 Million Raised Eric Trump: We have now raised almost $15 million in small dollar donations (including 50,000 NEW donors) since @SpeakerPelosi started this impeachment charade 72 hrs ago! Unbelievable numbers!! Keep it going — you and the dems are handing @realDonaldTrump the win in 2020!
Twitter

Democrats Hold Event on Childhood Stresses Caused by Trump

Democrats Hold Event on Childhood Stresses Caused by Trump House Democrats will hold a “discussion” Friday on “adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and the Trump Administration’s policies and proposals.” Breitbart

Why the left’s belief in a Swedish ‘utopia’ is based on a lie

NEW YORK POST:

When Elisabeth Asbrink invites you to visit her in Stockholm, Sweden, be sure to wear your very best socks.

“I hate it when people walk into my home in their shoes. In that way I am extremely Swedish,” she said. “We find it very, very rude.”

Removing your shoes before entering a home is a universal norm in Sweden, Asbrink says — but not a lesson her immigrant parents, born in Budapest and London, ever taught her.

“When they went to the homes of colleagues and friends they would dress up, then had to have dinner in their socks. Which they found very strange,” Asbrink recalled. “They believed that it was an old tradition, from when Sweden was a peasant country full of earth and mud.”

They were wrong, as Asbrink, an acclaimed journalist, learned years later.

In “Made in Sweden” (Scribe), out Tuesday, Asbrink explains the awkward truth: Sweden’s no-shoes rule is not a quaint custom carried to the city from Sweden’s farms but the lingering effect of an edict handed down by its all-encompassing welfare state.

9/11 BOMBSHELL CNBC News Anchor Ron Insana WTC-7 Brought Down by Controlled Implosion

9/11 BOMBSHELL CNBC News Anchor Ron Insana WTC-7 Brought Down by Controlled Implosion

Related:

Ph.D. Structural Engineer: “$10,000 to Anyone Who Can Refute New University of Alaska WTC-7 Study”:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/phd-structural-engineer-10000-to-anyone.html

@gerrycan1 debunks debunker Mick West's 2019 WTC 7 study analysis:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/gerrycan1-debunks-debunker-mick-west.html

Are there more problems with the UAF/Hulsey/AE911Truth WTC7 Draft Report or the NIST WTC 7 Report? You Decide...

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/09/are-there-more-problems-with.html

Giuliani's to testify before House regarding BIDEN'S Ukrainian Scandal

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 8:50 AM PT – Sat. Sept. 28, 2019
President Trump’s personal attorney says he is willing to testify before Congress about the Ukraine scandal.Congressional Democrats called for Rudy Giuliani’s testimony this week, amid reports he pushed the Ukrainian government to reopen its corruption probe into Joe Biden’s son Hunter.Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani speaks at a rally supporting a regime change in Iran outside United Nations headquarters on the first day of the general debate at the U.N. General Assembly, Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2019, in New York. (AP Photo/Jason DeCrow)This after information in the recent whistleblower complaint emerged, mentioning attempts by Giuliani’s associates to reach out to the current Ukrainian president’s team.In an interview on Friday, Giuliani said the move was perfectly legal, and that he has nothing to hide.“Would I like to testify and tell my story? Sure. I’ve been telling it. All the time. In fact, you know my story,” said Giuliani. “There’s nothing I can tell them that you can’t read online. From the very beginning, I’ve been totally transparent about this.”Giuliani reiterated that the whistleblower complaint can not be trusted because it was based solely on second hand information.

Friday, September 27, 2019

Being transgender is bad for your health

Skip to content
Alex Jones' InfoWars
THE ALEX JONES RADIO SHOW
LISTEN NOWWATCH NOW

FDA: OVER 6,000 DEAD FROM PUBERTY BLOCKING DRUG FOR TRANSGENDER CHILDREN
Parents of kids with gender dysphoria not warned about dangers of hormone blockers
Kelen McBreen | Infowars.com - SEPTEMBER 27, 2019 0 Comments
FDA: Over 6,000 Dead From Puberty Blocking Drug For Transgender Children
A drug used to block puberty in children with gender dysphoria is responsible for the death of over 6,300 people, according to the Food & Drug Administration (FDA).

The Christian Post reports Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron) “is being prescribed off-label for use in children who have been diagnosed with gender dysphoria despite the lack of formal FDA approval for that purpose.”

“The drug is clinically approved for treatment of precocious puberty, a condition where children start their pubertal processes at an abnormally early age and the blocker is administered for a short time until the proper age,” the outlet continues.

Citing FDA data, the article reads, “Between 2012 and June 30 of this year, the FDA documented over 40,764 adverse reactions suffered by patients who took Leuprolide Acetate (Lupron), which is used as a hormone blocker. More than 25,500 reactions logged from 2014-2019 were considered ‘serious,’ including 6,370 deaths.”

A California-based endocrinologist named Michael Laidlaw has been exposing the controversial tactic of prescribing testosterone to girls as young as 8 who suffer from gender dysphoria.

Laidlaw argues, “Gender dysphoria is not an endocrine condition, but is a psychological one and should, therefore, be treated with proper psychological care.”

However, when puberty blockers are given to children, an endocrine condition is created.

This dangerous practice is becoming increasingly lucrative for Big Pharma company AbbVie, with Lupron sales in the United States hitting $669 million in 2017.

WATCH LIVE

RELATED ARTICLES
Report: Hundreds of Documents Conflict with Joe Biden’s Account of Why Ukrainian Prosecutor Was Fired
REPORT: HUNDREDS OF DOCUMENTS CONFLICT WITH JOE BIDEN’S ACCOUNT OF WHY UKRAINIAN PROSECUTOR WAS FIRED
U.S. NEWS
Comments
Understanding The Impeachment Charade
UNDERSTANDING THE IMPEACHMENT CHARADE
U.S. NEWS
Comments
SCHIFF’S ‘RE-TELLING’ OF TRUMP PHONE CALL WITH UKRAINE HEAD GETS MOCKED AS ‘UNHINGED ORANGE-MAN-BAD FAN FICTION’
U.S. NEWS
comments
REPORT: TRUMP UPSET WITH KUSHNER’S CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM, THINKS IT’S A ‘POLITICAL LOSER’ AND ‘TOTAL DUD’
U.S. NEWS
comments
SHOCK AND AWE: DEMOCRATS ARE RUSHING TO HAVE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT READY FOR A VOTE AROUND THANKSGIVING
U.S. NEWS
comments
COMMENTS

SEARCH
Search for articles

LATEST STORIES
Big Tech Purging Latinos Who Support Trump – Watch Fire Power With Will Johnson NOW
Video: Trump Says We Are “At War”
Jon Voight Says Dems Waging ‘War on Truth’: ‘Stand Strong with President Trump’ Against Impeachment
Real Stable Genius: Today We Salute You Mr. Climate Change Activist!
Watch: Greta Thunberg Crumbles Without Script When Asked Simple Questions by Reporter
Pro-Abortion Group Bestows Hillary Clinton With Lifetime Achievement Award
GET INFORMED
Get the latest breaking news & specials from Alex Jones and the Infowars crew.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
hello world
VISIT OUR STORESHOP HERE
ULTRA 12
Your Price: $49.95
On Sale: $24.95
A powerful B12 formula fueled by the premium source of B12 - methylcobalamin - for TWICE the B12!

BUY NOW

LEARN MORE
ILLUSTRATION

Next
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
POLLS
With Democrats announcing new impeachment inquiry, what will Congress ultimately do to Trump?

Impeach
Impeach and remove
Nothing
View Results

Radio
Video
NewsWars
PPTV
Store
Infowars Life
T.O.S.
Archive
Advertise
Watch Alex Jones Show
Most Recent
D.M.C.A.
Corrections
About Alex Jones Show
Subscribe
Contact

RADIO SHOW▼
NEWS▼
VIDEOS▼
STORE
BREAKING NEWS
CONTACT▼
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE

Military suicides highest ever

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 6:35 AM PT — Friday, September 27, 2019
The suicide rate for active duty military members has reached a record high, and Pentagon officials are trying to grapple with the tragedies that are ticking upward. That’s according to a recent report from the Defense Department, which revealed suicides have been rising at an average of six-percent annually over the past five years.Most recently, the number of service members who took their own life jumped from 285 to 325 between 2017 and 2018. The Pentagon report applies to service members in the Army, Navy and Marine Corps.Military leaders say getting down to the root of the issue is difficult as they struggle to identify members with possible problems since some might be reluctant to seek help for fear it could affect promotions or security clearances.Several months ago, members of Congress talked with specialists about how to deal with issues veterans might grapple with after serving.“Many of them do not use veteran as there primary identity and so, that is why it’s really critically important that we embed these strategies in the U.S. health care system. So that no matter where a veteran goes for care, they will be greeted with a health care professional who’s been appropriately trained, equipped, and incentivized to do the right thing.” — Terri Tanielian, Sr. Behavioral Scientist – Rand CorporationFILE – In this Sept. 6, 2019, file photo, U.S. soldiers survey the the safe zone between Syria and the Turkish border near Tal Abyad, Syria, on a joint patrol with the Tax Abyad Military Council, affiliated with the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces. (AP Photo/Maya Alleruzzo, File)Following the new report, however, leaders at the Pentagon worry the military environment invites many stressors that make it sometimes almost impossible to identify root causes.Earlier this year, the president signed an executive order to help curb the suicide rate among veterans. The task force pulls federal governments, local governments and private sector partners together to find solutions to curb the tragedies.“They leave a military life and go to civilian life, and it is different. We must keep our promises to those who keep us free. Through today’s action I am launching the prevent initiative. The president’s road map to empower veterans and end the national tragedy of suicide.” — President TrumpMilitary officials say the number of suicides for the Air Force have slowed down, but they say they are still working on many initiatives such as an interactive education program to help members develop coping skills.
If you or anyone you know may be contemplating suicide please call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 for help.

Adam Schiff Steals Embarrassing Defeat from the Jaws of Normal Defeat

Rep. Schiff Fabricates What Trump Said In Ukraine Telephone Call Transcript

Rep. Schiff Fabricates What Trump Said In Ukraine Telephone Call Transcript California Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff read a portion of a transcript of a telephone conversation between President Donald Trump and his Ukrainian counterpart Thursday before the House Intelligence Committee — but the congressman largely fabricated the president’s words Daily Caller

City bans calling someone an ‘illegal alien’ out of hate

NEW YORK POST:

It’s now against the law in New York City to threaten someone with a call to immigration authorities or refer to them as an “illegal alien” when motivated by hate.

The restrictions — violations of which are punishable by fines of up to $250,000 per offense — are outlined in a 29-page directive released by City Hall’s Commission on Human Rights.

“‘Alien’ — used in many laws to refer to a ‘noncitizen’ person — is a term that may carry negative connotations and dehumanize immigrants, marking them as ‘other,’” reads one passage of the memo. “The use of certain language, including ‘illegal alien’ and ‘illegals,’ with the intent to demean, humiliate, or offend a person or persons constitutes discrimination.”

The directive goes on to list several examples of acts and comments that would run afoul of the restrictions, including harassing people over their accents or grasp of English, or wielding the threat of a call to Immigration and Customs Enforcement as a tool of hate.

Warren flustered after asked about ethics plan

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., talks about her plans if she becomes president during a rally at Keene State College, in Keene, N.H., on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2019. (Kristopher Radder/The Brattleboro Reformer via AP)
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:35 AM PT — Friday, September 27, 2019
2020 Democrat presidential hopeful Elizabeth Warren appeared flustered on the campaign trail after a reporter asked her about her ethics plan. Warren spoke with reporters at a campaign event in New Hampshire this week, where someone asked if her plan “would allow her vice president’s son to serve on the board of a foreign company.”The question comes amid a shift in media focus to fellow 2020 candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter, who worked for a Ukrainian oil and gas company while his father was serving as vice president.Warren initially responded to the question saying she would not allow her vice president’s son to work for a foreign company, but she quickly backtracked.

Nicole Sganga
✔
@NicoleSganga
· Sep 25, 2019
Replying to @NicoleSganga
WARREN: “It’s not a matter of politics, it’s a matter of constitutionality. Nobody‘s above the law, not even the President of the United States... If Congress does not hold this man accountable, he will break the law again & again. It‘s time for impeachment now.” #nhpolitics

View image on Twitter

Nicole Sganga
✔
@NicoleSganga
FLAG: Senator Elizabeth Warren appears uncharacteristically flustered when asked if her ethics plan would allow her Vice President's son to serve on the board of a foreign company: "No," she said. "I don't know. I mean I’d have to go back and look at the details." #nhpolitics

Embedded video
7,369
7:38 PM - Sep 25, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
5,129 people are talking about this
Warren said in her plan she will “categorically ban the practice of private lobbying for foreign governments, foreign individuals and foreign companies.”

Medical Disclaimer