only 6% of people believe media, only 9% of people believe government. I think we can establish about the same number believe the fake polls who are owned by globalists trying to force their puppet establishment on us through deception. Hillary for Prison!!
Thursday, June 30, 2016
The Legal Team That Could Spell The End Of Hillary Clinton’s Political Career
(Clinton.news) Republicans and conservatives have, for years, tried to see justice brought to the Clintons, by far one of the most investigated and compromised political families in recent history. There has been scandal and rumors of scandal following Bill and Hillary Clinton since their days in the Arkansas governor’s mansion.
Even now Hillary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI for wrongful use of a personal email server to conduct official business as secretary of state, for sending and receiving classified data and for possible improper use of her office to enrich her and her husband’s charitable foundation.
But the pair have always managed to elude punishment – though as president, Bill Clinton became the first chief executive to be impeached by the House in more than 100 years. That run of luck may be about to end, at least for the former first lady and now presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.
As reported by The Daily Beast, attorneys from Judicial Watch, a conservative legal watchdog group that has been the biggest thorn in the side of the Clintons since the “co-presidents” managed to win the White House in 1992, just scored a major victory in federal court. U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan took the unusual step recently in allowing Judicial Watch to depose State Department officials and aides to Clinton in regards to her email server.
A frustrated Sullivan said from the bench that the “constant drip” of information – via leaks, news reports and tardy government compliance with court orders – which needed to stop and the process of getting to the bottom of what Clinton did – or did not do – sped up.
That’s good news for Judicial Watch, which has been trying to do just that via Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, primarily. But many more remain unresolved, and the organization believes if it can access the information it seeks, it will ultimately mean Clinton’s latest scandal will be her last, at least as a public official.
“Mrs. Clinton clearly has no respect for the rule of law,” Tom Fitton, Judicial Watch’s president, said in an interview last month with The Daily Beast at his offices in Washington. He said she and the president are masters at “using public office for personal gain” via high speaking fees, outsized advances on books (that ultimately did not sell well) and donations to the Clinton Foundation.
“The fact that they are a success is an indictment of Washington,” he said.
While Judge Sullivan’s order isn’t a panacea for Judicial Watch in its pursuit of data related to Clinton’s time in office and use of the server, it is huge in that in that being able to depose in a FOIA case doesn’t happen very often.
Some political observers say that as more days pass before the election it appears less likely that Obama’s Justice Department will actually indict Clinton. But that decision won’t even have to be made if the FBI says it cannot find enough evidence against her to even recommend an indictment (which, quite honestly, seems impossible given all we have learned through news reports). Every step of the way, however, Judicial Watch will be lurking.
Read the entire Daily Beast story here.
Sources:
Stupid Butt-Hurt Millennials
Stupid butt-hurt millennials are whining and crying because the UK voted to leave the EU.
Newt Gingrich: The elite media are terrified of Donald Trump
On 'Hannity,' former House speaker slams the one-sided coverage designed to prop up Hillary Clinton
None Dare Call It Conspiracy
If Obama is arming terrorists while at the same time disarming Americans - wouldn't that be considered treason?Darrin McBreen talks to political activist and former member of the original Black Panther Party, Larry Pinkney, about the Muslim refugee crisis that Donald trump calls a Trojan Horse.
Full Show - Donald Trump Exposes Hillary as Communist Chinese Spy - 06/29/2016
On this Wednesday, June 29 edition of the Alex Jones Show, we continue breaking down the terror attack in Turkey that left 41 dead at one of the largest airports in the world. Also, a new Quinnipiac University poll shows presidential candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in a dead heat, following Trump's unveiling of his economic plan with emphasis on bringing jobs back to America. On today's show, filmmaker Gary Heavin discusses the success of his recent film "Amerigeddon," the elections and more.
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
Talk Show Host Claims Trump Will Mass Murder Americans
Joy Behar, one of the co-hosts of ABC's The View, claims that Donald Trump is working for a terrorist organization and will murder Americans. Whoopie Goldberg agrees. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
Another Day, Another ‘Mainstream Media’ Political Reporter Caught Lying About Trump
(Trump.news) If you are still waiting for presumptive GOP nominee Donald J. Trump to get a fair shake in the mainstream media this election cycle, you can officially let go of that pipe dream, because it’s not going to happen.
In what appears to be yet another instance of unethical journalism, CNN’s Tom Foreman, in an attempt to protect Trump’s likely Democratic opponent, Hillary Clinton, and to discredit him, only discredited himself.
As reported by Breitbart News, the fib came, ironically, during a “fact check” segment, where Foreman and others were attempting to analyze the charges and claims Trump made about Clinton in his speech on Wednesday, in which he called her a “world class liar” and “the most corrupt person to ever seek the presidency.”
The incorrect fact check was in regards to U.S. immigration policy; in an effort to undermine Trump’s factually correct statements CNN gave a demonstrably false presentation of the “facts.”
“The segment was remarkable in that it not only revealed CNN’s profound ignorance of federal immigration policy, but an examination of the segment’s transcript also reveals that CNN ignored and blatantly distorted what Trump had actually said,” Breitbart News reported.
Foreman accused Trump of making a “false” statement about Clinton’s refugee policy when in fact what Trump said was exactly right.
“The reality check team was very busy during all of this [speech],” Foreman said. “Trump attacked Clinton’s plan to increase the number of Syrian refugees taken into America.”
He then played video footage of Trump’s speech in which Trump said, “Under her [Clinton’s] plan, we would admit hundreds of thousands of refugees from the most dangerous countries on Earth – with no way to screen who they are, what they are, what they believe, where they come from.”
Foreman then attempted to analyze Trump’s statements. In part, he said:
He was talking about this in reference to the Syria program in context of his speech. So let’s look at the reality there. President Obama has said he’d like to get 10,000 Syrian refugees in here by the end of September this year. Yes, Hillary Clinton has talked about increasing that substantially to 65,000 people being brought in in the near term. Still, that is not hundreds of thousands of people out there. … [I]f you look at his overall claim: hundreds of thousands, no checking whatsoever, that is simply false.
Actually, Trump didn’t say that Clinton would admit hundreds of thousands of refugees, but that her plan would admit hundreds of thousands of refugees from the most dangerous countries on Earth (emphasis added). She would have to get congressional approval for much of what she wants to do, but her plan is to admit that many, most of whom would be enticed to vote for her party.
Also, Clinton has made no indication that she would limit her immigration importation program to a single year. Plus, once a Syrian migrant arrives, he or she will be able to bring in their families as well (a process called “chain migration” – a well-used Democratic tactic).
Foreman also downplayed Trump’s statement regarding the inability for U.S. security and intelligence officials to properly vet new migrants from regions where government has all but broken down. But he does not mention that these “security analysts” include President Obama’s own senior officials — such as FBI director James Comey and DNI director James Clapper.
Source:
Tuesday, June 28, 2016
Infectious Immigration Hitting America
As illegals cross the border thanks to Obamas Dream Act they are bringing crime and disease to our front door step.
Related:
Trump is right: YOUR medical care IS at risk
- Trump Assassination Attempt Stopped By Police - Perpetrator is ILLEGAL ALIEN
- Donald Trump Was Right: Mexico is sending...
- America Saves THIS Much $$ By Sending Illegal Aliens Home –TRUMP IS RIGHT!
- TRUMP WAS RIGHT: 20% of Illegal Immigrants Caught at the Border Have Criminal Record - Report: Nearly 90,000 Illegal Immigrant Criminals Released Last Year
- The Battle Lines Are Drawn - Illegal Alien Crime Accounts for over 30% of Murders in Many States
- ICE: 124 illegal immigrants released from jail later charged in 138 murder cases
- Rpt: Immigrant Criminals Re-offend At Higher Rate - Illegal Immigrants - America's Newsroom
- In California Jamiel Shaw Whose Son was Shot by Illegal Alien Joins Trump on Stage
- BORDER PATROL AGENTS CATCH PREVIOUSLY DEPORTED CHILD SEX OFFENDERS SNEAKING BACK IN
- US Intelligence: ISIS Taking Advantage of Open Borders
- Trump on stopping heroin from flowing over the border, in New Hampshire and elsewhere
NC BROTHERS WHO SUPPORT TRUMP; “IF HE’S RACIST, GIVE US COLD HARD FACTS, WE’RE WAITING”
The mainstream media has been allowing ignorant pundits and so-called experts to be interviewed on TV who maliciously blurt how “Donald Trump is racist!” They do this to carry their narrative and hurt Trump’s real message of fixing America where the politicians have screwed it up. Today’s youth are born into the world of liberal leadership thinking and believing they have no responsibility, no accountability so they can say whatever they want, whenever they want.
Every day, more and more minorities are flocking to Youtube to explain why they are supporting Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton. That’s a huge turnaround from Mitt Romney back in 2012, don’t you agree?
This is a great video and should be share. These two young men have most definitely captured the right message using common sense to come to a conclusion that is based on fact and not liberal propaganda.
Related:
Donald Trump a Racist?
Is This The Kind Of Clown Show Can Expect From Democrats If Clinton Wins In November?
(Clinton.news) It was quite a spectacle to see earlier this week – part 1960s-era civil disobedience and part juvenile delinquency. I’m not sure which part dominated but I’m leaning towards the latter.
On Wednesday, a number of Democrats staged a “sit-in” on the floor of the House of Representatives, upset that GOP Speaker Paul Ryan of Wisconsin and the majority of other Republicans who control the chamber weren’t real keen on denying Americans a basic inalienable and constitutionally-protected right to due process under the law.
Like their colleagues in the Senate – and like every left-wing hack pundit on TV and in the news – House members were pining for new restrictive gun control legislation that, if it had passed, would have faced a lawsuit the moment the ink was dry. That’s because the legislation would have given the federal government arbitrary powers to put anyone and everyone it “suspected” of being a “terrorist” on a government watch list – a list that, if you make it, would prevent you from exercising your Second Amendment right to bear arms. No formal charges; no trial; no conviction. Just an arbitrary designation that big government nannies “promise” they wouldn’t abuse.
President Obama was all for it, of course, which is all the more reason to oppose it on its face. Why? Oh, because the Obama Department of Homeland Security has been trying to designate military veterans, conservative gun owners and other “right-wing extremists” as terrorists since the earliest days of his administration (here and here [PDF]). Guess what? These individuals would beput on government terrorist threat lists and would not be able to buy a gun or fly.
Just for holding different political views.
You know who else is all for that kind of capricious and broad government power? Likely Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, and that brings us back full-circle to the clown show her fellow Democrats put on in the House last week.
As reported by The Washington Times:
Just hours before the sit-in, Mrs. Clinton met with House Dems for the first time since she clinched the presidential nomination from Vermont Sen. Bernard Sanders. The Hill reported she entered the meeting to chants of “Hillary! Hillary!” and “the theme of the day was one word — unity, unity and more unity.”Nothing unifies Democrats like gun control.It makes you wonder: Was the entire sit-in staged by the Clinton campaign as a way to advance its political agenda, unify the party around her candidacy and steal the news cycle from Mr. Trump at the same time?
Also, there is no denying that Rep. John Lewis, who led the sit-in, is a close personal ally of Clinton. After her 2008 loss in the Democratic primary to Obama, Lewis – Democrat of Georgia – said he would go all in for her this time around. He has been campaigning with her in many states and is helping her secure the African-American vote.
This kind of childish nonsense reminds one of the time when Wisconsin Senate Democrats actually fled their state rather than stay behind and do their job, all because they opposed GOP Gov. Scott Walker’s budget-cutting proposals.
If Clinton wins in November – but Republicans hold Congress, which is likely – is this behavior by Democrats what Americans who are already fed up with the insanity to expect? If every time the GOP thwarts one of her initiatives, are congressional Democrats going to go all 1960s on us again?
Let’s hope not. What’s more, let’s hope enough sensible Democratic voters were embarrassed enough by this ridiculous stunt to replace some of the participants this fall.
Sources:
Trump’s Claim That The Clinton Foundation Profited From Russian Uranium Deal Looks Spot-On
(Trump.news) Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald J. Trump made a claim about his likely Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, and her husband that seemed to stun some political observers, though it wasn’t a charge he simply pulled out of thin air.
And it wasn’t from a newly-released book that has supposedly been “debunked,” either.
It came from no less than The New York Times.
On Tuesday Trump, in a blistering speech directed at Clinton in which he called her a “world-class liar” and “the most corrupt” person ever to “seek the presidency,” also made the claim that the Clinton Foundation profited mightily from donors who were involved in a uranium deal early in the Obama administration – while Hillary served as secretary of state.
“Hillary Clinton’s State Department approved the transfer of 20 percent of America’s uranium holdings to Russia, while nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation,” Trump charged, as reported by Left-wing hate site Slate.
Critics pounced immediately, claiming that Trump culled the information from Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” That part is true.
But what is also true is that Schweizer’s information was vetted by the Times for an April 23, 2015 story that the paper not only reported, but verified through its own additional sources.
The Times reported:
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributionswere not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One,Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.
So not only did the Times verify information Schweizer used in his book, it also added to it.
And yet, the Left-wing media and pundit class has accused Trump of somehow embellishing fabricated information that has not been “debunked” but rather verified by the Left’s own paper of record. It just doesn’t get anymore verifiable than that.
The Times also pointed out that it isn’t known whether the donations played any role in the eventual approval of the deal. But what is clear is the time line – donations flowed to the Clinton Foundation at the same time the deal was being negotiated, a deal that could not have been approvedwithout passing muster at the State Department.
President Obama, as head of the Executive Branch, had the ultimate approval, but to claim that Trump is incorrect to raise suspicions about the timing of the donations and the amount of money paid to the Clinton Foundation from donors directly involved in the deal is absolutely inappropriate and it smacks of an attempt to cover up the Clintons’ role.
Without question this is a legitimate campaign issue and something the American people ought to know and be able to decide for themselves.
Sources:
HRC Blames 25 Years Of Wild Accusations For Trust Deficit With American Voters - Outnumbered
No, she's not a criminal. She's just a well-established liar who surrounds herself with convicted criminals who has been under criminal investigation a few times. Nothing to see here...
Crooked Hillary Killary Shillary Hitlary... by debunkerbuster
Elizabeth Warren Mocks Trump's 'Goofy Hat'
Oh I dunno, the hat's lookin' pretty good to me!
You know what's really goofy? Supporting Hillary Clinton after saying this...
Monday, June 27, 2016
Show This Video to a Hillary Clinton Supporter
It's a compilation of clips that is nearly an hour long. If you can get a Hillary supporter to watch it and they still want to vote for her afterwards, then there is nothing that can change their mind.
Crooked Hillary Killary Shillary Hitlary... by debunkerbuster
#NeverTrump: Delegate Says His Preference Trumps Voters
A Virginia delegate to the Republican Convention has filed a lawsuit asserting that Virginia law and GOP rules requiring him to vote on the first ballot in accordance with the primary election is a violation of his “rights”. We look at the frivolous nature of his claim and the racketeering and corruption it represents.
Legendary Lie #1 - Lying Crooked Hillary
Legendary Lie #1 - Lying Crooked Hillary by debunkerbuster
https://www.lyingcrookedhillary.com/
Hillary has no shame! The Benghazi attacks were a preventable tragedy disgraced further by Hillary’s web of lies. She knew within hours that the attacks in Benghazi were a terrorist attack, and not a spontaneous protest due to a You Tube Video. But she lied anyways. She stood in front of the flag-draped coffins of four Americans that died serving their country and peddled the lie that the video was to blame both to the victims’ families and the American public.
But she didn’t only lie about what she knew about the Benghazi attack; she had the gall to say that she never told the Benghazi victims’ families that the video was to blame – essentially calling THEM liars.
One family member, Charles Woods – father of Tyrone Woods, a retired Navy Seal killed in the Benghazi attacks on September 11, 2012 –recalls that Hillary told him, “We are going to have the filmmaker arrested who was responsible for the death of your son.” Patricia Smith, grieving mother of victim Sean Smith, remembers clearly what Hillary told her as well and says she never received a real explanation from Clinton or the Obama administration on what happened.
The truth is that massive security failures at the highest levels of the Obama administration and Clinton’s State Department put the Benghazi mission at grave risk as terrorist threats grew daily. Her incompetence cost lives and her attempt to cover up the truth is an indignity on the memory of the fallen heroes in Benghazi.
Related:
Crooked Hillary Killary Shillary Hitlary... by debunkerbuster
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)