Showing posts sorted by relevance for query ukraine. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query ukraine. Sort by date Show all posts

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

Dems ignore facts and treaties that invalidate their impeachment push


Trump News
Search
Search
Dems, mainstream media rush to “convict” Trump of impeachable offense involving Ukraine but ignore 1999 treaty REQUIRING cooperation in criminal matters
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

The Left-wing Washington establishment media and Democrats, the political party they serve, have been working overtime for a week trying to convince Americans that President Donald Trump committed an impeachable offense for a) something he never did; and b) something former Vice President Joe Biden did do.

Specifically, they are claiming that the president engaged in a “quid pro quo” when he allegedly withheld military aid from Ukraine unless the government helped his administration investigate a business deal involving Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

According to a transcript of a July phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Zelensky, no such quid pro quo was offered or mentioned. And the military aid the U.S. promised Ukraine was, in fact, delivered. Nothing in the transcript suggests anything different.

But there is another aspect to the assistance that Trump was seeking: A 1998 treaty signed by then-President Bill Clinton and ratified by the U.S. Senate requiring Washington and Kiev to cooperate on criminal investigations.

As James Howard Kunstler noted on his website:

Someone in Impeachmentville is not paying attention. Of course, diverting the rubes is exactly the point of the latest CIA operation to negate the 2016 election. Has nobody noticed that there is a treaty between Ukraine and the USA, signed at Kiev in 1998 and ratified by the US Senate in 2000. It’s an agreement on “Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters.”

The treaty states: “The Treaty is self-executing. It provides for a broad range of cooperation in criminal matters. Mutual assistance available under the Treaty includes: taking of testimony or statements of persons; providing documents, records, and articles of evidence; serving documents; locating or identifying persons; transferring persons in custody for testimony or other purposes; executing requests for searches and seizures; assisting in proceedings related to restraint, confiscation, forfeiture of assets, restitution, and collection of fines; and any other form of assistance not prohibited by the laws of the requested state… ([etc].”

What part of this does House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the rest of the impeachment-happy Democrats not understand? This is a treaty; under our Constitution it’s the same as a duly-passed law. It must be followed. (Related: GET READY: It’s time to start taking names of all the traitors pushing the fabricated “impeachment” coup against this nation.)

Is our republic about to die?
So, if President Trump, using this “self-executing” treaty, wanted to know about possible criminal corruption involving any American in his/her dealings with Ukraine, regardless of whether that person was a former vice president or the son of a former vice president, he could do that. Legally.

In fact, by law, he’s required to do that. And by treaty, the government of Ukraine is required to cooperate — which it has, apparently.

According to presidential lawyer Rudy Giuliani, a number of Ukrainians have provided him with sworn testimony claiming that Joe Biden actually did what he bragged about in a video during a Council on Foreign Relations seminar last year: He threatened to withhold $1 billion in loan guarantees from Ukraine if that government didn’t fire a prosecutor who was investigating criminal corruption involving a company that appointed Hunter Biden to their board — at $50,000 per month.

The Democrats have to know this; Pelosi has to know it. She also knows about the treaty between the U.S. and Ukraine, because she’s been in Congress for decades (and has become a poster child for term limits — like quite a few other members).

And yet, they are running full-tilt towards impeachment or, at least, that’s what they are saying. We won’t know if they are serious until they hold an actual vote in Congress to begin an impeachment inquiry, which is required by the Constitution.

This Ukraine ‘scandal’ is just the latest attempt by Democrats and their deep state allies to overturn the 2016 election. If they are successful, our republic is dead.

Sources include:

TheNationalSentinel.com

Kunstler.com

NewsTarget.com

FacebookTwittergoogle_plusShare
Tagged Under: bill clinton, Congress, Constitution, criminal investigation, democrats, fake scandal, Hunter Biden, impeachment, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, President Trump, President Zelensky, Treaty, Ukraine








COMMENTS
comments powered by Disqus

RECENT NEWS & ARTICLES

Dems, mainstream media rush to “convict” Trump of impeachable offense involving Ukraine but ignore 1999 treaty REQUIRING cooperation in criminal matters
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

Stupid: NYTimes’ Paul Krugman fears “thousands of journalists” will go to jail under Trump, but Obama was the REAL threat to a free press
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

SNL suggests assassinating President Trump instead of impeachment
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Rep. Adam Schiff linked to prominent Ukrainian arms dealer
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

What’s going on? DoJ lawyers argue department NEVER received order from Trump to declassify FISA documents
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

Fox News joins criminal coup attempt against President Trump, as traitor Paul Ryan twists the knife
09/30/2019 / By JD Heyes

WATCH: Mark Levin hammers FNC’s Ed Henry over allegation of Trump ‘illegal’ behavior during call with Ukraine president
09/30/2019 / By News Editors

GET READY: It’s time to start taking names of all the traitors pushing the fabricated “impeachment” coup against this nation
09/30/2019 / By Mike Adams

Has the time come for Trump to fire ALL the top operators at the FBI and CIA, then start over?
09/30/2019 / By JD Heyes

Deep State intelligence community secretly changed “first-hand knowledge” rules to allow Ukraine “whistleblower” to file complaint against Trump
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

‘This is the beginning of the end’ (again) – Impeachment fever returns over another ‘bombshell’ and ‘turning point’ that has already fizzled out
09/29/2019 / By News Editors

UNCOVERED: Ukraine ‘whistleblower’ is an anti-Trump Deep State CIA employee who used fake news reports to lodge complaint
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

Trump vows to “uphold the right of free speech” in warning to social media giants censorship of conservatives
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

Same Democrats who terrorize their own children with climate hysteria nonsense now blame Trump for causing “stress” on children
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

REPORT: Corrupt FBI covering up the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

‘Impeachment’ is nothing less than a full-scale Communist coup attempt by treasonous Democrats who long ago sold out America and the American people for Globalism
09/27/2019 / By News Editors

Wow: Dems are literally REWRITING what “Trump said” on call with Ukrainian president and just making up as they go
09/27/2019 / By JD Heyes

Judicial watch sues for documents on Biden forcing firing of Ukraine prosecutor
09/27/2019 / By News Editors

Lying fake news media edits out 500 words from Trump-Ukraine phone transcript to make president look guilty of impeachable offense
09/26/2019 / By JD Heyes

BUSTED: Democrats accusing Trump of “treason” for asking Ukraine to help with Biden probe did the SAME thing to find dirt on HIM
09/26/2019 / By JD Heyes
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.

All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.

Contact Us with Tips or Corrections

All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

Privacy Policy

Biden lied! Evidence he did discuss Ukrainian business with son

Skip to content
Alex Jones' InfoWars
THE ALEX JONES RADIO SHOW
LISTEN NOWWATCH NOW

PHOTO SHOWS JOE, HUNTER BIDEN GOLFING WITH UKRAINE GAS EXEC
Casts doubts on Biden’s claims he never discussed Ukraine business with son
Infowars.com - OCTOBER 1, 2019 2 Comments
Photo Shows Joe, Hunter Biden Golfing with Ukraine Gas Exec
A photo showing Joe Biden and his son Hunter playing golf with a Ukraine energy executive is casting doubts on the Democrat candidate’s claims that they never discussed Ukraine business matters.

The photo from 2014, which surfaced Monday on Tucker Carlson Tonight, shows Biden pictured alongside Hunter and Devon Archer, both of whom were board members of Ukraine energy firm Burisma Holdings at the time.

BUSTED: Photo shows Joe Biden and son Hunter golfing with Ukraine gas company exec back in 2014https://t.co/0pCHXuZ3oY

— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) October 1, 2019

According to transcripts of a phone call released by the White House, Trump asked for a “favor” from Ukraine to look into 2016 election interference. He additionally asked Ukraine President Zelensky to look into possible corruption after Joe Biden “bragged” that he bribed a prosecutor to end an investigation into his son’s company.

Following the media frenzy over President Trump’s phone call with the Ukraine president, in which Trump allegedly offered a quid pro quo for the government to look into the Biden-Hunter scandal, Biden had attempted to distance himself from the matter by denying he and Hunter ever discussed his career.

“I have never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings,” he recently stated. “I know Trump deserves to be investigated. He is violating every basic norm of a president. You should be asking him why is he on the phone with a foreign leader, trying to intimidate a foreign leader. You should be looking at Trump.”

Hunter additionally told The Washington Post in July, “At no time have I discussed with my father the company’s business or my board service.”

In a later interview with the New Yorker, Hunter did admit he and his father discussed Ukraine “just once.”

Democrats, meanwhile, are ignoring Biden’s blatant corruption as they continue to pursue an impeachment against Trump.

WATCH LIVE

RELATED ARTICLES
Hungary Offers to Patrol Italian Border
HUNGARY OFFERS TO PATROL ITALIAN BORDER
EUROPEWARS REDIRECT
Comments
School Forced Children to Join 'Climate Change' Protest
SCHOOL FORCED CHILDREN TO JOIN ‘CLIMATE CHANGE’ PROTEST
GLOBALISM
Comments
STEPHEN MILLER: SO-CALLED UKRAINE WHISTLEBLOWER ‘A DEEP STATE OPERATIVE’ WHO HAS ‘CONTEMPT FOR THE PRESIDENT’
GLOBALISM
comments
WATCH: GRETA THUNBERG CRUMBLES WITHOUT SCRIPT WHEN ASKED SIMPLE QUESTIONS BY REPORTER
GLOBALISM
comments
BRUSSELS OFFICIALS WANT COMMUTERS TO ‘HITCHHIKE’ TO WORK
EUROPEWARS REDIRECT
comments
COMMENTS


SEARCH
Search for articles

LISTEN TO THE ALEX JONES SHOW – HERE'S HOW
Podcast | Listen | On Demand | Archive
WEEKDAYS 11–3PM AND SUNDAY 4–6PM
How To Get The Banned Infowars Podcasts On Your Smartphone - Find out how to subscribe to our shows!
WATCH LIVE NOW

LATEST STORIES
Jussie Smollett Triggered After Being Compared To 6th Grade Race Hoaxer
Photo Shows Joe, Hunter Biden Golfing with Ukraine Gas Exec
Expert Asks If Fed Has Economy on Life Support
Dutch Farmers in Mass Revolt Against Green Fascism
Tiananmen Square 2.0: Hong Kong Now a War Zone
Pop Quiz on The Beach, Part 2
GET INFORMED
Get the latest breaking news & specials from Alex Jones and the Infowars crew.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
hello world
VISIT OUR STORESHOP HERE
COME AND TAKE IT BETO O’ROURKE 2ND AMENDMENT T-SHIRT
Your Price: $29.95
On Sale: $19.95
Beto O'Rourke let Americans know in the third debate he was coming for your guns - send a message back that it won't be that easy!

BUY NOW

LEARN MORE
ILLUSTRATION
POLLS
Will Hillary Clinton jump into the 2020 race?

No. (36%, 1,956 Votes)
Yes. (33%, 1,777 Votes)
God I hope so. (30%, 1,628 Votes)
Total Voters: 5,361

Radio
Video
NewsWars
PPTV
Store
Infowars Life
T.O.S.
Archive
Advertise
Watch Alex Jones Show
Most Recent
D.M.C.A.
Corrections
About Alex Jones Show
Subscribe
Contact

© 2019 Infowars.com is a Free Speech Systems, LLC Company.
All rights reserved. Digital Millennium Copyright Act Notice.

RADIO SHOW▼
NEWS▼
VIDEOS▼
STORE
BREAKING NEWS
CONTACT▼
SEARCH
SUBSCRIBE

Saturday, October 5, 2019

John Brennan traveled to Ukraine with fake passport - to research Trump

Trump News
Search
Search
RUSH LIMBAUGH: John Brennan traveled to Ukraine with fake passport — to research Trump
10/02/2019 / By News Editors

Rush Limbaugh broke some shocking news today on former CIA Director and Trump-hater John Brennan.
Brennan reportedly traveled to Ukraine with a fake passport to dig dirt on Trump.

(Article by Jim Hoft republished from TheGatewayPundit.com)

Brennan has been leading the charge against President Trump since he entered office.

Just this past weekend Brennan called on all the Deep State hacks to file reports based on hearsay and secondhand information to damage President Trump.

John O. Brennan

@JohnBrennan
A reminder to federal officials:

There is no limit on the number of individuals who can use the whistleblower statute.

If you think you were involved in unlawful activity as a result of a directive from Mr. Trump or someone doing his bidding, now is the time to report it.

100K
8:06 AM - Sep 28, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy
52.3K people are talking about this
This partisan lunatic was in charge of the CIA.
That’s scary.

Rush Limbaugh said Brennan traveled to the Ukraine with a fake passport to research Trump.
The deep state leader was traveling to Ukraine to find dirt on Trump.

Via The Rush Limbaugh website:

RUSH: I got an email, “What do you mean, Brennan traveled to Ukraine with a fake passport? I didn’t hear that.” Well, folks, I’m sorry. Let me give you the details. John Brennan, Obama’s director-CIA, went to Ukraine under a fake passport so that nobody would know it was him. Fake name. Can you do that? Can you get a fake passport? No. John Brennan can, CIA director. I’m surprised he even needed a passport. But he went under a fake passport to get opposition research on Trump!

The Obama administration originally lied about Brennan’s visit, but they were forced later to admit the report was true after evidence of Brennan’s visit emerged. This is that guy, John Brennan, who over the weekend encouraged every deep stater to come forward and blow the whistle on Trump. (summarized) “There is no limit on the number of individuals who can use the whistleblower statute. If you think you were involved in unlawful activity as a result of Trump, now is the time to report it!”

Is Brennan gonna pay all of you whistleblowers? Is he gonna pay for your protection? This is a former director of the CIA asking the deep state to rise en mass and start blowing the whistle on Trump with a bunch of made-up lies! This guy’s fingers are as dirty as anybody’s on the dossier, including McCain’s people. He traveled to Ukraine under a fake passport. The Obama regime denied it until the news was undeniable. Then they had to admit it.

Read more at: TheGatewayPundit.com

FacebookTwitterShare
Tagged Under: CIA, deep state, fake passport, John Brennan, lies, President Trump, traitors, treason, Trump, Ukraine, Whistleblower






COMMENTS

RECENT NEWS & ARTICLES

DELUSIONAL: Pelosi compares impeachment coup against President Trump to American revolution
10/03/2019 / By News Editors

The imminent collapse of Adam Schiff’s “whistleblower” hoax will devastate Dems in 2020 and beyond
10/03/2019 / By Mike Adams

China unveils “doomsday” hypersonic missiles that can strike any U.S. city in 30 minutes, while the Pentagon is focused on making sure transgenders feel safe in the military
10/03/2019 / By JD Heyes

Trump identifies “leaker” Adam Schiff as real author of Ukraine “whistleblower” complaint at press conference: Is this why Dems are protecting his identity?
10/03/2019 / By JD Heyes

Impeachment… or CIA Coup?
10/03/2019 / By News Editors

Bombshell in the making: Did Adam Schiff pull a Jussie Smollett and FABRICATE the existence of the whistleblower?
10/02/2019 / By Mike Adams

“Mad” Maxine Waters says impeaching Trump not enough, he must be “imprisoned” in “solitary confinement” — is she even sane?
10/02/2019 / By JD Heyes

RUSH LIMBAUGH: John Brennan traveled to Ukraine with fake passport — to research Trump
10/02/2019 / By News Editors

As Dems and their media lackeys scream for transcripts to Trump’s calls with foreign leaders, how come they never asked to see Obama’s transcripts?
10/02/2019 / By JD Heyes

Bestselling author Peter Schweizer provides details on timeline of Joe and Hunter Biden corruption in Ukraine
10/02/2019 / By JD Heyes

Civil war on
10/02/2019 / By News Editors

Wayne Allyn Root: Let’s see Obama’s transcripts
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

The hierarchy of deep state escalation that will end in the attempted assassination of President Trump and engineered terrorism across America
10/01/2019 / By Mike Adams

Dems, mainstream media rush to “convict” Trump of impeachable offense involving Ukraine but ignore 1999 treaty REQUIRING cooperation in criminal matters
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

Stupid: NYTimes’ Paul Krugman fears “thousands of journalists” will go to jail under Trump, but Obama was the REAL threat to a free press
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

SNL suggests assassinating President Trump instead of impeachment
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Rep. Adam Schiff linked to prominent Ukrainian arms dealer
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

What’s going on? DoJ lawyers argue department NEVER received order from Trump to declassify FISA documents
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

Fox News joins criminal coup attempt against President Trump, as traitor Paul Ryan twists the knife
09/30/2019 / By JD Heyes

WATCH: Mark Levin hammers FNC’s Ed Henry over allegation of Trump ‘illegal’ behavior during call with Ukraine president
09/30/2019 / By News Editors
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.

All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.

Contact Us with Tips or Corrections

All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

Privacy Policy

Saturday, October 1, 2022

#UKRAINE WINNING AGAINST #RUSSIA OR ARE THEY?---TUCKER CARLSON ON UKRAINE'S PROSPECTS OF 'WINNING' THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA---PUTIN IS WINNING WAR IN UKRAINE AND EUROPE IS SLIPPING INTO POVERTY AND THE MIDDLE AGES - TUCKER 💣---RUSSIA IS WINNING A FINANCIAL WAR 🇷🇺 JAMES RICKARDS---UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS TRIED USING THIS INFAMOUS CLIP AS PROOF THAT THEY'RE WINNING IN KHERSON

DannySage84 Ukraine never had a chance, the USA is essentially at war with Russia. If America wasn't involved, Ukraine would have folded months ago.

LordRex33 The only way Ukraine will match Russia would be if NATO got directly into it with both imperialistic boots.



#UKRAINE WINNING AGAINST #RUSSIA OR ARE THEY?---TUCKER CARLSON ON UKRAINE'S PROSPECTS OF 'WINNING' THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA---PUTIN IS WINNING WAR IN UKRAINE AND EUROPE IS SLIPPING INTO POVERTY AND THE MIDDLE AGES - TUCKER 💣---RUSSIA IS WINNING A FINANCIAL WAR 🇷🇺 JAMES RICKARDS---UKRAINIAN PROPAGANDISTS TRIED USING THIS INFAMOUS CLIP AS PROOF THAT THEY'RE WINNING IN KHERSON

Friday, February 25, 2022

VIDEO GOES VIRAL OF ALEX JONES PREDICTING UKRAINE WAR IN OCTOBER PROVING WHY THEY CENSORED HIM - Order Out Of Chaos: How The Ukraine Conflict Is Designed To Benefit Globalists

 



When conflict erupts, you are going to see a swarm of media stories in western nations trying to outline the complexity of the relationship between Russia and Ukraine since the fall of the Soviet Union, while ignoring certain inconvenient truths. You will see many of these stories construct a narrative which then oversimplifies the situation and paints Russia as the monstrous aggressor. The goal will be to convince the public that our involvement in Ukraine is a moral and geopolitical necessity. There will be attempts to gain American favor and a call for US boots on the ground. Joe Biden will be at the forefront of this push. 

The surface trigger for the confrontation is obviously rooted in the 2009 decision by western powers and Ukrainian officials to consider the country for membership in NATO. Most of Russia’s actions when dealing with Ukraine can be owed to NATO involvement in the region, including the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014. Strategically, it makes sense. Imagine if Mexico suddenly announced it was joining a military alliance with China and that Chinese military assets were going to be transferred near the US southern border? It probably would not end well. 

To be sure, Russia has a history of hypocritical behavior when it comes to its involvement in the affairs of its neighbors. For example, only a few months ago Kazakhstan was facing mass protests which the government claimed were caused by “foreign manipulation.” Zero proof was presented to justify this assertion. However, the claim was enough to rationalize the deployment of 2300 Russian troops over the border to shut down the protests...

The diplomatic mess between Ukraine and Russia can be blamed in part on both sides, and it’s this kind of historical ambiguity where globalists tend to thrive. The fog of war helps to obscure establishment activities and often it is hard for people to see who is truly benefiting from the chaos until it’s too late. It is my belief that the Ukraine problem is at least partially engineered and that it is designed as a first domino in a chain of intended crises...
https://alt-market.us/order-out-of-chaos-how-the-ukraine-conflict-is-designed-to-benefit-globalists/

Tuesday, November 14, 2017

Stop Saying, “Putin Invaded Ukraine and Annexed Crimea”

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=maxine+waters

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it” – Goebbels, Hitler’s propaganda minister. This is perfectly applicable to the accusations about Russia and Putin regarding Ukraine. Every pundit and politician keeps repeating the mantra that Putin invaded Ukraine and annexed Crimea. However, like many big lies, this narrative quickly falls apart under objective scrutiny.


Putin did not “invade” Crimea in 2014. Russia has a naval base in Sevastopol, Crimea, and thus it’s normal for Russian soldiers to be in Crimea.

Crimea wasn’t even truly a part of Ukraine. It was known as the “Autonomous Republic of Crimea” after the dissolution of the USSR.

Putin did not “annex” Crimea. Crimea had a referendum and the people overwhelmingly (>95%) chose to go with Russia.

Why the referendum was not “rigged”: More than 75% of Crimeans speak Russian as their native language. Obviously they would choose to join Russia. There’s also intense and overt anti-Russian racism in Ukraine. For example, since 2014, Ukraine has banned Russian TV stations, Russian social media, websites, etc.

Even without the ethnic factor, deciding whether to join Russia or Ukraine is a no-brainer – it’s similar to asking a region if they want to be a part of the U.S. or Mexico.

Nobody protested after or since the referendum. In fact, Crimeans called the outcome “going back home.”
https://www.activistpost.com/2017/11/stop-saying-putin-invaded-ukraine-annexed-crimea.html

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, November 14th, 2017.]


Related:
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html

Thursday, September 26, 2019

Former CIA analyst says CIA 'whistleblower' is blowing smoke


More Accurate than The New York Times, Washington Post, CNN and MSNBC for Two Years and Counting!
Grand Opening of The Gateway Pundit Store — Click Here

Larry C. Johnson: The Deep State ‘Whistleblower’ Blows Smoke
Jim Hoft by Jim Hoft September 26, 2019 56 Comments
42Share33TweetEmail
Guest post by Larry C. Johnson

Now that we have seen the whistleblower complaint filed by a CIA officer against President Trump, there should be little doubt that it is a fraud and represents an abuse of the whistleblower process. I know genuine whistleblowers (e.g., Bill Binney, Kirk Wiebe, Ed Loomis, Thomas Drake, John Kiriakou, etc.) and have been one myself. I am familiar with the kind of information one must possess (or should possess) in order to initiate a complaint. This complaint does not even meet the stupid standard. It is a trumped up complaint.

This CIA officer who filed the complaint has no direct evidence or knowledge. He heard things from other people. He was not party to the phone conversation and did not have access to the transcript. Instead, he cited public media as “corroboration” for his allegations, including reports by John Solomon.

The whistleblower is supposedly an analyst. Pray to God he is not. If this is an example of this clown’s analytical chops then we now know what the CIA has been on the downward slide. Rather than focus on evidence and facts, this guy relied on rumor.

The egregious conduct of the whistleblower is exceeded by the incompetence of the Intelligence Community Inspector General. When the complaint was filed a competent professional IG would have dismissed it immediately because it was based on hearsay. If we follow his logic, every single Presidential conversation with a foreign leader that involves discussion of a policy or issue an analyst does not support could/should become an IG investigation. That is not an intelligence function no matter how sincerely or fiercely the complainant believes their beef merits attention.

It would appear that the Democrats who plotted with this CIA officer were counting on Donald Trump to claim executive privilege on his conversation with Ukrainian President Zelensky and, based on the same privilege, withhold the whistleblower complaint.

Whoops!! Trump did not play ball. He preempted the Democrat Kabuki theater by releasing the relevant documents and transcripts President Trump pre-empted the ability of the Democrats to accuse him of illegal acts by citing his refusal to turnover documents.

How can anyone claiming whistleblower status be allowed to file a complaint on something about which they have no direct knowledge? The entire premise of the intelligence community is the access to reliable sources, i.e., people who have direct knowledge of what they are reporting on. The Dems are in a state of flacid erectus.

To appreciate the lies of the so-called Whistleblower, let us compare his claims with what actually transpired:

The Whistleblower Claims:

The President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals.

What President Trump Actually Said:

I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike… I guess you have one of your wealthy people… The server, they say Ukraine has it. There are a lot of things that went on, the whole situation. I think you’re surrounding yourself with some of the same people. I would like to have the Attorney General call you or your people and I would like you to get to the bottom of it. As you saw yesterday, that whole nonsense ended with a very poor performance by a man named Robert Mueller, an incompetent performance, but they say a lot of it started with Ukraine. Whatever you can do, it’s very important that you do it if that’s possible. . . .

The other thing, There’s a lot of talk about Biden’s son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so whatever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it… It sounds horrible to me.

COMMENT–At no time did President Trump say anything about the 2020 election or the need to do something to Biden to preempt his ability to run for the Democrat nomination. Trump’s request was specifically about what happened in light of Joe Biden’s public claim–I REPEAT, PUBLIC CLAIM–that he used the threat of withholding aid from Ukraine unless they fired the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating the company that hired Joe’s cocaine head son, Hunter.

The Whistleblower Claims:

Multiple White House officials with direct knowledge of the call informed me that, after an initial exchange of pleasantries, the President used the remainder of the call to advance his personal interests. Namely, he sought to pressure the Ukrainian leader to take actions to help the President’s 2020 reelection bid:

• initiate or continue an investigation2 into the activities of former Vice President Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter Biden;

• assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 20 I 6 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm Crowdstrike,3 which initially reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the DNC’s networks in 2016; and

• meet or speak with two people the President named explicitly as his personal envoys on these matters, Mr. Giuliani and Attorney General Barr, to whom the President referred multiple times in tandem.

What Zelensky Actually Said about Hunter and Joe Biden:

President Zelenskyy: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First of all I understand and I’m knowledgeable about the situation. . . He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue. The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case. On top of that, I would kindly ask you if you have any additional information that you can provide to us, it would be very helpful for the investigation to make sure that we administer justice in our country with regard to the Ambassador to the United States from Ukraine as far I as I recall her name was Ivanovich. It was great that you were the first one who told me that she was a bad ambassador because I agree with you 100%. Her attitude towards me was far from the best as she admired the previous President and she was on his side. She would not accept me as a new President well enough. . . .

I also want to ensure you that we will be very serious about the case and will work on the investigation. As to the economy, there is much potential for our two countries and one of the issues that is very important for Ukraine is energy independence. I believe we can be very successful and cooperating on energy independence with United States. We are already working on cooperation.

President Zelensky is asking President Trump for more help and strongly agreeing with Trump that the U.S. Ambassador was acting as a foe of Ukraine. To reiterate–the issue of corruption by Joe Biden and his spawn was already in public and was an issue for Ukraine, not just Trump. Again, not one word about the 2020 election or the Democrat scramble to find a candidate. No threat by Trump to withhold aid. No quid pro quo of any type. Joe Biden is on the record in public demanding Ukraine do what Biden wants or else the U.S. would withhold $1 Billion dollars in aid.

The Whistleblower lied. Not a single mention was made of “locating and turning over DNC servers.” This is a complete fabrication by the so-called Whistleblower.

President Zelensky noted that his people had already spoken with Rudy Giuliani and voiced not one single concern about that. And Zelensky said that his Government would fully cooperate with a U.S. law enforcement investigation.

Worth noting that John Solomon of the Hill is out tonight with documents that expose Joe Biden as a liar in this matter.

The heart of the Whistleblower complaint is a lie. The analyst reported hearsay but, as you can read for yourself, was not what was said on that call.

This is an outrageous abuse by the intelligence community. The CIA cannot and should not be trusted. This analyst is an incompetent who does not know how to distinguish between fact and suspicion.

42Share33TweetEmail
Powered by ZergNet

Celebrities Who Went Missing and Were Never Found

The Real Reason RBG Didn't Retire During Obama's Term

Demi Moore Makes an Eye-Opening Reveal About Jon Cryer

Greta Thunberg Turns Trump's Attack Back on Him

The Untold Truth of Jeff Sessions

Charlize Theron Shares Rare Photo of Her Transgender Daughter

You Might Like
 
 
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Join The Gateway Pundit Newsletter
Sign up for our free email newsletter, and we'll make sure to keep you in the loop.

Email Address
Subscribe
Join TGP on Facebook

* Facebook censors conservative content. Please like our page on Facebook and please check The Gateway Pundit homepage here for our latest stories. Thank you.

Google discriminates against conservatives. We recommend using Duck Duck Go as your search engine. We support free thought.
Contact The Gateway Pundit
Email Technical Support
Report Issues With Website Performance
Email Comment Support
Send Tips to The Gateway Pundit
Email Jim Hoft
You Might Like
  
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Powered by 

DONATE FOR TRUTH!
Your donations keep theGatewayPundit.com online.
Thank you for your support.

GP Favorite American Blogs
GP Favorite International Blogs
GP Favorite Media
Democracy & Human Rights
Favorite Military & Foreign Service
Favorites From Gateway City & Area
Great Websites
StatCounter - Free Web Tracker and Counter
View My Stats
Search The Gateway Pundit
Search

GATEWAY
PUNDIT
Where Hope Finally Made a Comeback.
Home
About
Advertise
Privacy
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Terms
Contact
© 2019 The Gateway Pundit – All Rights Reserved.


Sunday, September 29, 2019

Judicial watch Sue's for documents on Biden forcing firing of Ukrainian prosecutor


LOG IN

SUBSCRIBE
2 Comments
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden greets guests at the Polk County Democrats' Steak Fry on Sept. 21, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)
Democratic presidential candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden greets guests at the Polk County Democrats' Steak Fry on Sept. 21, 2019 in Des Moines, Iowa. (Scott Olson/Getty Images)MORE
POLITICS
Judicial Watch Sues for Documents on Biden Forcing Firing of Ukraine Prosecutor
BY MARK TAPSCOTT
September 26, 2019 Updated: September 26, 2019
WASHINGTON—Judicial Watch announced Sept. 26 that it has filed suit in federal court seeking to force the State Department to release all official U.S. government documents related to the firing of a Ukrainian prosecutor, as demanded by former Vice President Joe Biden.

ADVERTISING

The nonprofit government watchdog’s suit was in response to the government’s failure to respond to a May 7 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for:

Any and all records regarding, concerning, or related to Viktor Shokin’s investigation of Mykola Zolchevsky, and Shokin’s resignation at Ukraine’s Prosecutor General.
Any and all records of communication between any official, employee, or representative of the Department of State and any official, employee, or representative of the Office of the Vice President regarding Shokin.
Postal records confirmed that the Office of Programs and Information Services, which handles FOIA requests sent to the State Department, received the Judicial Watch request. The department didn’t respond within the time limits set by federal law, according to Judicial Watch.

The FOIA was filed after a video became public of Biden telling a Jan. 23, 2018, conference at the Council on Foreign Relations of his threatening to withhold more than $1 billion in U.S. assistance to the government of Ukraine if officials didn’t fire Shokin before Biden departed the country in six hours.

Shokin was at the time conducting a corruption investigation of Burisma, a Ukraine energy company that was paying Biden’s son, Hunter, $50,000 a month in consulting fees, according to media reports.

“I remember going over and convincing our team that we should be providing loan guarantees, and I went over to Kyiv for, I guess, the 12th or 13th time, and I was supposed to announce there was another $1 billion loan guarantee,” Biden told the conference.

“And I had gotten a commitment from [then-Ukraine President Petro] Poroshenko and [then-Ukraine Prime Minister Arseniy] Yatsenyuk that they would take action against [Shokin], and they didn’t.

“So they were walking out to the press conference, and I said, ‘We’re not gonna give you the billion dollars.’ They said, ‘You have no authority, you’re not the president.’ The president said, I said, ‘Call him.’

“I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars, and I’m leaving here, I believe, in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’

“Well, son of a …, the prosecutor got fired.”

The Judicial Watch lawsuit for the Biden records was announced the same day as acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire testified before the House Select Committee on Intelligence concerning his handling of a complaint filed by an anonymous federal worker described by the news media as a “whistleblower.”

The complaint was given to the Inspector General for the Intelligence Community (IGIC). It claimed President Donald Trump threatened in a July 25 telephone call to cut off U.S. military assistance if Ukraine’s then-newly elected President Volodymyr Zelensky didn’t reopen the investigation of Burisma and Hunter Biden. The complaint also claimed White House aides tried to hide call records.

Trump released the official transcript of the call Sept. 25, calling it “a nothing call,” and denying any wrongdoing in the conversation with Zelensky.

Maguire received the complaint from the IGIC, concluded it was “credible,” and gave it to the Department of Justice (DOJ). The DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel reviewed it and concluded the allegations in the complaint failed to meet the legal definition of an “urgent concern” in the federal whistleblower protection statute and warranted no further action.

The unidentified individual who filed the complaint acknowledged that he or she did not actually hear the president’s call to Zelensky, but only learned about it secondhand from half-a-dozen White House officials. The IGIC also said there were “indicia of an arguable political bias” against Trump in the complaint.

Congressional Democrats insist Trump’s alleged threat is an impeachable crime and are moving forward with multiple investigations they claim will determine whether formal articles of impeachment should be filed in the House of Representatives.

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.), the ranking minority member of the intelligence panel, told the Maguire hearing, “What we have with this storyline is another Steele dossier. … In the Democrats’ mania to overturn the 2016 elections, everything they touch gets hopelessly politicized.”

The Steele dossier is the discredited document that was investigated in the two-year probe, which found no Trump/Russia collusion. The dossier had been paid for by Trump’s 2016 opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

Contact Mark Tapscott at mark.tapscott@epochtimes.nyc

Share
RECOMMENDED

LANGUAGES
English
Chinese
Spanish
Hebrew
Japanese
Korean
Indonesian
French
German
Italian
Portuguese
Swedish
Dutch
Russian
Ukrainian
Romanian
Czech
Slovak
Polish
Turkish
Persian
Subscribe Advertise About Us Contact Us RSS Feeds Terms of Services Privacy Policy Copyright Policy
@ COPYRIGHT 2000 - 2019

Monday, January 27, 2020

The dishonest impeachment case


1600 Daily
The White House • January 24, 2020
The dishonest impeachment case

Today marks the end of House Democrats’ 3-day presentation of their historically weak Articles of Impeachment against President Trump. Starting tomorrow, the President will have a chance to respond to Democrats’ dishonest case. 
 
As expected, the media is going the extra mile to prop up Rep. Adam Schiff’s (D-CA) performance this week. Their hope, much like Schiff’s argument itself, is that if you repeat a lie enough, people might soon forget you don’t have any actual evidence for it.
 
 MUST WATCH: Caught! ABC anchor tries to cut off the President’s counsel  
 
That strategy was on full display in today’s finale. Schiff spent long portions of his presentation lecturing Senators on the importance of U.S. security aid to Ukraine, claiming that President Trump undermined it. The truth, of course, is that President Trump is the one who secured that lethal defense aid for Ukraine in the first place, reversing the Obama Administration’s policy of weak support.
 
It gets better. Guess who voted against authorizing the assistance for Ukraine? House Democrats’ own impeachment managers. Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) voted no on the FY2020 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which included $300 million for Ukraine. Nadler joined Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) in voting against the FY2019 NDAA, as well, with its $250 million for Ukraine.
 
Unfortunately, this behavior is par for the course for Democrats in Washington lately. Their obsession with attacking President Trump has led to all sorts of outright lies over the past 3 years, many of which the media simply declined to fact-check:
 
Beginning in 2017, Schiff lied multiple times that he had seen evidence of collusion between President Trump and Russia. Of course, the Mueller Report exposed that as a leftwing hoax—so Schiff just moved on to Ukraine.
 
Also in 2017, Schiff tried to repeatedly mislead the public on the credibility of the debunked Steele dossier. In 2018, he issued a memo to Republicans stating that the FBI and Justice Department didn’t abuse the surveillance process to spy on the Trump campaign. That is now a proven falsehood.
 
Chasing another hoax, Schiff tried to obtain compromising photos of the President that never even existed. He was duped by Russian pranksters.
 
It was discovered that Schiff’s team coordinated with the whistleblower at the center of the Ukraine allegations before the complaint was ever even filed. Schiff had previously lied that there was no contact with the whistleblower.
 
That’s just a small sample of some of the worst lies from one Democrat impeachment manager. But no matter how many things they make up, the facts of the case won’t change: President Trump is not accused of a corrupt action or of breaking the law. He is under attack by avowed political enemies on the subjective basis of motive and intent because they disagree with his policies.
 
Think about that as a precedent.
 
“‘Dazzling’: Adam Schiff's history of inaccuracies, conspiracy theories follows him to Senate floor”
 
Shameless: “Adam Schiff Refers to Russia Over 30 Times During Senate Impeachment Hearing”

What President Trump told the 47th March for Life

President Trump made history today, becoming the first President to join thousands of Americans at the annual March for Life rally in Washington. Here are a few important things he told the crowd:
 
When it comes to abortion, Democrats have embraced the most radical and extreme positions.
Unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House.
 
Every life brings love into this world. Every child brings joy to a family. Every person is worth protecting.
 
Young people are the heart of the March for Life—and it is your generation that is making America a Pro-Family, Pro-Life Nation!
 
READ: Thousands of Americans are marching to defend the unborn—and the President stands with them.
 
Pro-life Americans: President Trump "has pursued policies we’ve dreamt of"

Photo of the Day

Official White House Photo by Joyce N. Boghosian
President Trump delivers remarks at the 47th Annual March for Life gathering | January 24, 2020


Privacy Policy | Contact the White House | Unsubscribe
The White House · 1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW · Washington, DC 20500 · USA · 202-456-1111

Saturday, October 5, 2019

Let's see Obama's transcripts


Trump News
Search
Search
Wayne Allyn Root: Let’s see Obama’s transcripts
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

The Trump-Ukraine phone call controversy is still at the top of the news.

First, let me start by urging all good conservatives to call House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to congratulate her on re-electing President Trump.

(Article by Wayne Allyn Root republished from TheGatewayPundit.com)

Nancy did a great job. With enemies like her, who needs friends? In the words of President Trump, “Nancy, you’re the greatest!”

Secondly, I’m a big supporter of the right to bear arms. Another big shout out to Nancy. Because Pelosi and the Democrat Congress just proved you don’t need a gun to commit suicide. You can just talk yourself to death.

It’s clear Pelosi and the Democrats just committed mass political suicide. Radical Democrats suffering from “Trump Derangement Syndrome” convinced Nancy to jump off a cliff…and the entire Democrat Congress followed like sheep.

Think I’m wrong? John Kasich is the Governor of Ohio. He hates Trump. He attacks and denigrates Trump at every opportunity. Even he just reported on Friday, in Ohio and the Heartland of America, no one cares about this, no one is even talking about it.

Democrats haven’t just “over-reached.” They’ve walked into the biggest trap in the history of politics.

No normal person, without mental illness, cares that Trump had a phone call with a world leader and asked him to look into massive corruption by an American politician on foreign soil. Most normal Americans are saying, “It’s about time.”

Now to the real point of this column.

We’re debating a phone call between a President and a world leader. Why would any of us have access to this call? Have you ever heard the details of any other phone call between world leaders and a U.S. President?

Heck, Trump is now the most transparent president in history. He released the transcript of a classified call with a world leader.

Meanwhile Obama still has never released his college transcripts. There’s never been a single leak. You’d think his college records were “classified.”

But the real question that should be asked because of this controversy is, why can’t we see transcripts of Obama’s conversations with world leaders?

What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.

We’ve now seen Trump’s conversation. We all want to see Obama’s conversations with Putin.

We all heard Obama whisper on an open microphone to Russia’s president that once re-elected he could give Putin whatever he wanted. So, what do you think Obama said on private classified calls to Putin?

Liberals think we have a right to listen to Trump’s calls, right? So why can’t we listen to Obama’s calls with world leaders? We need something to measure Trump’s supposed “crimes” against.

I heard from a friend, who heard from a friend, that Obama sold America down the river in calls with Putin. Let’s see the transcripts of Obama’s calls to Putin.

I heard Obama was way too friendly with the radical leaders of the Arab Spring and Muslim Brotherhood. Let’s see the transcripts.

I heard Obama sold Israel down the river in calls with leaders of Middle Eastern countries. Let’s see the transcripts.

I want to see a transcript of John Kerry’s Iran Treaty negotiations with rogue terrorist nation Iran. Why did he give them a “deal of the century?”

Can we hear the conversations between Kerry and Obama about the Iran Treaty?

How about the negotiation for American hostages held by Iran? I can’t wait to hear Obama offer ransom to terrorists.

And of course, the obvious transcript everyone is dying to read. We all want to see transcripts of Obama and Biden discussing the Ukraine situation. Did Joe disclose to Obama what his son Hunter was up to? Did they discuss Burisma, his son’s energy company? Did Obama give Biden permission to withhold aid to Ukraine until they killed the criminal investigation into the company employing Biden’s son?

The precedent has been set. You’ve all opened up a big can of worms. I won’t rest until I see the transcipts of Obama’s calls. Only then, can we know if Trump did anything wrong, or unusual.

I can’t wait to be a fly on the wall to hear what Obama said to world leaders about America, Americans, American exceptionalism, Israel and the Jewish people. I’d give my left arm to hear those conversations.

C’mon Obama. Show us all these transcripts. Maybe even your college transcript. I dare you.

Read more at: TheGatewayPundit.com

FacebookTwitterShare
Tagged Under: barack obama, corruption, democrats, government, Nancy Pelosi, Obama, politics, radical, transcript, transcripts, transparency, Trump, Trump Derangement Syndrome, Ukraine






COMMENTS

RECENT NEWS & ARTICLES

As Dems and their media lackeys scream for transcripts to Trump’s calls with foreign leaders, how come they never asked to see Obama’s transcripts?
10/02/2019 / By JD Heyes

Bestselling author Peter Schweizer provides details on timeline of Joe and Hunter Biden corruption in Ukraine
10/02/2019 / By JD Heyes

Civil war on
10/02/2019 / By News Editors

Wayne Allyn Root: Let’s see Obama’s transcripts
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

The hierarchy of deep state escalation that will end in the attempted assassination of President Trump and engineered terrorism across America
10/01/2019 / By Mike Adams

Dems, mainstream media rush to “convict” Trump of impeachable offense involving Ukraine but ignore 1999 treaty REQUIRING cooperation in criminal matters
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

Stupid: NYTimes’ Paul Krugman fears “thousands of journalists” will go to jail under Trump, but Obama was the REAL threat to a free press
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

SNL suggests assassinating President Trump instead of impeachment
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

EXPLOSIVE REPORT: Rep. Adam Schiff linked to prominent Ukrainian arms dealer
10/01/2019 / By News Editors

What’s going on? DoJ lawyers argue department NEVER received order from Trump to declassify FISA documents
10/01/2019 / By JD Heyes

Fox News joins criminal coup attempt against President Trump, as traitor Paul Ryan twists the knife
09/30/2019 / By JD Heyes

WATCH: Mark Levin hammers FNC’s Ed Henry over allegation of Trump ‘illegal’ behavior during call with Ukraine president
09/30/2019 / By News Editors

GET READY: It’s time to start taking names of all the traitors pushing the fabricated “impeachment” coup against this nation
09/30/2019 / By Mike Adams

Has the time come for Trump to fire ALL the top operators at the FBI and CIA, then start over?
09/30/2019 / By JD Heyes

Deep State intelligence community secretly changed “first-hand knowledge” rules to allow Ukraine “whistleblower” to file complaint against Trump
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

‘This is the beginning of the end’ (again) – Impeachment fever returns over another ‘bombshell’ and ‘turning point’ that has already fizzled out
09/29/2019 / By News Editors

UNCOVERED: Ukraine ‘whistleblower’ is an anti-Trump Deep State CIA employee who used fake news reports to lodge complaint
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

Trump vows to “uphold the right of free speech” in warning to social media giants censorship of conservatives
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

Same Democrats who terrorize their own children with climate hysteria nonsense now blame Trump for causing “stress” on children
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes

REPORT: Corrupt FBI covering up the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein
09/29/2019 / By JD Heyes
Trump.News is a fact-based public education website published by Trump News Features, LLC.

All content copyright © 2018 by Trump News Features, LLC.

Contact Us with Tips or Corrections

All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

Privacy Policy

Monday, February 28, 2022

How Biden Could End the Ukraine Crisis

 

How Biden Could End the Ukraine Crisis

DAVID GIBBS, dgibbs@email.arizona.edu
Gibbs is professor of history at the University of Arizona and has written extensively on NATO. He recently wrote the piece “Claims Over Broken Promises About NATO Simmer at the Heart of the Ukraine Crisis.”

He said today: “In its efforts to expand NATO into Ukraine, the Biden administration is recklessly inflaming the international crisis, endangering global security. It is often forgotten that in 1990, the U.S. promised that NATO would not expand into the former communist states of Eastern Europe; ‘not one inch Eastward,’ Soviet leaders were assured by the U.S. Secretary of State at the time. Despite this promise, NATO soon expanded into Eastern Europe, eventually placing the alliance up against Russia’s borders. To resolve the current crisis, the Biden administration should offer a written guarantee that Ukraine will not be allowed to join NATO. To do this would satisfy the key Russian demand, consistent with the 1990 U.S. commitment.”

Gibbs is author of the book First Do No Harm: Humanitarian Intervention and the Destruction of Yugoslavia, published by Vanderbilt University Press.

https://accuracy.org/release/how-biden-could-end-the-ukraine-crisis/

Sunday, August 7, 2022

🤬

Report

Biden Admin Poised to Give Ukraine $1 Billion Weapons Package

Joe Biden’s administration is prepared to send Ukraine a $1 billion weapons package as early as Monday, according to a Reuters report.
Breitbart

Be Aware

CBS News Exposes Ukraine Weapons Scam: “30% Maybe Reaches Its Final Destination”

CBS released a documentary titled “Arming Ukraine” looking into what has happened to the military weapons that have been given to Ukraine. The documentary exposed that only “like 30%” of weapons given to Ukraine reached their final destination.
Gateway Pundit


Thursday, September 26, 2019

Everything you need to know about another manufactured scandal

×
Rush Limbaugh
For a better experience,
download and use our app!

Download
Now
THE RUSH LIMBAUGH SHOW MAIN MENU

Overview: Everything You Need to Know About Another Manufactured Scandal
Sep 25, 2019

RUSH: Okay. Stick with me here today, folks, because by the time the program is over, you’re gonna know everything you need to know about this latest faux scandal. This is as big a nothing burger as Trump-Russia collusion was. There is nothing here. This thing is manufactured like Christine Blasey Ford was manufactured. This is manufactured like the Steele dossier was manufactured.

This is all about the Democrats having something with their media brethren to never stop charging Trump with. It’s simply about the nature of the charge. It is not about evidence. There isn’t any evidence. It’s all about reversing the 2016 presidential results. They cannot get over it. And when I say “nothing burger,” I’m talking about substance. Politically, it’s not a nothing burger because it’s the ongoing effort of the Democrats to overturn the election results of 2016.

A couple of other things I want you to understand. What Nancy Pelosi has done here regarding impeachment is not move it farther along. She did not do anything but convene an inquiry. There has been no floor vote. There will not be a floor vote. There will not be any impeachment, not any real impeachment. Everything you’re seeing is deception.

Everything that you’re seeing and reading in the Drive-By Media is designed to deceive you. In fact, what Pelosi has done here is a very clever way to slow down the impeachment process, not speed it up. I will explain all this as the program unfolds before your very eyes and ears.

What we’re also learning is that Joe Biden may be the most corrupt politician in Washington bar none. And what I suspect is going on is something I mentioned yesterday. This effort going on here is actually a twofer. It is designed by the Democrats to take out both Trump and Biden and clear the way for anybody else, probably Elizabeth Warren.

So that is the overview. And honestly, folks, no matter how difficult it may be, do not doubt me on this. There’s nothing here. There is no violation of law. There is no violation of the Constitution. There is no violation of campaign finance laws. There is nothing here like there was nothing to Trump-Russia collusion. There’s nothing here like Christine Blasey Ford had nothing on Brett Kavanaugh.

It is simply the same effort, the same objective: overturn the election results of 2016 using different narratives or different stories or different scandals. But it is all the same thing. Even though I’m gonna tell you what’s in the transcript of the phone call between Trump and the Ukrainian president — and, by the way, you know, yesterday we had that sound bite from James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence. He was openly trying to tell those Democrats be very careful here, I don’t know, that transcript, it may not be what we think it is.

And he then said that transcript could be doctored, the Trump people could make that all up like they make up places where hurricanes are gonna go in Alabama. He was very prescient. They launched this without knowing what was in that phone call. But, see, it doesn’t matter. It’s what they can say was in the phone call. It’s what they are saying that Trump did. It is the never ending allegation that the Drive-Bys originate, the Democrats parrot.

And, by the way, for those of you Republicans out there who are outraged by this, let me tell you something. Going on Fox News and tweeting ain’t gonna cut it. It’s not going to push back on this. Don’t think because you’ve sent out a tweet that nobody but your own followers are gonna read that you’ve pushed back.

And don’t think that doing an interview on Fox News is going to be seen by news consumers that are gonna be affected. It ain’t gonna work. Republicans need to do more than just tweet and go on Fox News. Besides that, who wants to sit next to Donna Brazile on Fox News? What the hell is that?

So let me get started here with some specifics. This is a massive, massive organizational job. I doubt there is a single human being in media today that could do this without bringing in a bunch of guests and without having a bunch of people on the phones to explain things. I’m gonna walk you through this taking all the complexity out of this, or as much of it as I can.

Let me tell you first off what I think Donald Trump was actually doing on that phone call to the Ukrainian president to congratulate him after a presidential victory. And let me interrupt myself here and remind you of something. It doesn’t really matter, as far as the scandal of this, it doesn’t matter what was said in that phone call. That phone call is just the latest hook for the Democrats to not stop the ongoing series of allegations.

The nature of the evidence is irrelevant. They are simply harping on the seriousness of the charge. And I think this is so outrageous, the elected Republican causcus in the House and in the Senate needs to come out in force yelling at the top of their lungs about this. This is pure harassment. This has done so much damage to the U.S. national security.

The one guy about this who first commented on it was right, Phil Mudd, former CIA guy, was on CNN and outraged when he found out that somebody in the intel community was listening in to a phone conversation. Well, guess what? The whistleblower wasn’t listening in. Do you know we now know, with the release of this transcript, we know more than the whistleblower knew.

So the whistleblower is effectively irrelevant today. It doesn’t matter what the whistleblower said. It doesn’t matter where he testifies, because with the release of the transcript, we know more than the whistleblower knew. In a legal sense, that is devastating. It just takes the whistleblower out of this. He’s irrelevant, whoever it is. The only interest in the whistleblower is for whom does he or she work? Hillary Clinton? Barack Obama? Joe Biden? Chuck Schumer? Nancy Pelosi?

We want to find out for whom this whistleblower was doing his job, dirty work. But Phil Mudd had it right. Now you’re president of the United States and you’re on a phone call, and there’s all kinds of people listening to these phone calls. When President Trump calls another foreign leader, you’re in the Situation Room and there’s all kinds of people monitoring this. This is serious stuff. There have to be witnesses. There’s a memorialization of the call, a transcript, of all of these. Presidents make these calls with all of the confidence in the world that nobody’s gonna leak it.

Well, look what happened. Somebody leaks a bunch of crap about what Donald Trump said on the phone call with the president of Ukraine. Let’s review. Let’s go back and look what the Drive-By Media told us about this phone call. They told us that the whistleblower had heard that the president was going to withhold funds from Ukraine. The president was gonna blackmail Ukraine. The president was gonna withhold money that we had pledged if they didn’t investigate Biden.

Guess what? That’s not in the transcript. Trump didn’t do it. Never stated. It’s not there. Then we were told by the Drive-By Media that Trump had said eight times in that phone call “the Bidens” and “the Biden investigation” and “pressure.” We were told that Trump mentioned it eight times to the president of Ukraine: Investigate Biden, find out what Biden did, find out what Biden’s son has done.

Zilch, zero, nada. There were not eight times. And there was no quid pro quo. The president was not suggesting that, “Hey, here’s a way you can get the money if you’ll do what I want.” The reporting on this has been a lie. Everything that was supposedly incendiary about this never happened. And yet the Democrats and Pelosi acted on it and created this phony impeachment scam.

Their base is among the biggest bunch of deceived people in the country today because there is no impeachment that has begun. It is an impeachment inquiry. It has not moved the ball down the road an iota. I’ll explain that in a minute when I get back to the chronology of this thing.

None of these incendiary things that we were told Trump had said, none of them are in the transcript. None of ’em. You have to think Trump was implying it. You have to think that Trump was speaking in code. You have to think that he and the Ukrainian president have some secret way of understanding their words if you want to draw these conclusions.

But, again, folks, it doesn’t matter. The call is simply the way the Democrats can continue this ongoing quest of theirs to try to position Donald Trump as corrupt and dishonest and a threat to national security and all of that. Let me tell you what I think Trump actually was doing on this call. Because, you know what? When I read the transcript, I was stunned. I came across a name in this transcript that blew me away!

Have you read the transcript, Mr. Snerdley? What did you do when you saw the word “CrowdStrike” in this transcript? I said, “Wait a second here. Trump is asking this guy and talking to this guy, the president of Ukraine, about CrowdStrike.” Let me tell you what Trump was doing and I’m gonna come back and tell you why I think it. I think Trump was asking the president of Ukraine to aid the Attorney General William Barr in his ongoing investigation of the origins of the investigation into Trump.

See, here’s the thing you have to know about Trump. Trump is a very proud man. Doing what he did in 2016 is almost unheard of. One guy from outside the political system taking on all the money of the political system and all of the political professionals, comes in and literally wipes the floor with 15 other Republicans, secures the Republican nomination with practically no money. Jeb Bush had a hundred million dollars invested in him and he got three delegates, for example. Trump comes in, he won this election, he won it fair and square, and in his mind, he won it with good, old-fashioned American values: hard work, stick-to-itiveness, competitive instincts, commitment, being the best he could be every day, setting goals and accomplishing them.

He worked harder than anybody in the 2016 campaign. Compared to Hillary Clinton, who was on vacation for most of it, Donald Trump worked his butt off. And the one thing that irritates him more than anything is this ongoing allegation that he cheated, that he didn’t win it legitimately. He seethes over this. Because it’s the exact opposite. He did win it on his own. He won it without the assistance of any of the Washington establishment.

He won it with Republicans and Democrats against him. He won it with the dreaded deep state against him. He won it with the European Union against him. He won it and he won it big, and he shocked and stunned them all. It was a magnificent achievement, and they have been, ever since, attempting to take it away from him. They’ve been trying to tell everybody the Russians cheated with him, that he colluded with the Russians, that he’s a Russian agent, maybe even a traitor, and he seethes over this.

And even the dud that Robert Mueller was and even the dud that the Mueller report was, people think, “Well, that should satisfy Trump.” No, it doesn’t because the Democrats are not stopping, folks. They’re trying to destroy Kavanaugh, again. They’ve never stopped trying to destroy Trump. They’re trying to overturn the presidential election results of 2016. They are trying every day to take this magnificent achievement away from him. And that’s why he’s not giving it up.

So I am convinced that he was asking the Ukrainian president for assistance. When he mentions CrowdStrike — and I think this is one of the reasons the Democrats today are so bent out of shape. CrowdStrike is who they hired when their servers got hacked in 2016. That’s one of the events that started all of this rolling. Remember the Democrat National Committee, Debbie “Blabbermouth” Schultz, would not let the FBI examine that server.

That server was hacked. The Democrats fear that some of the stuff on that server ended up in the Podesta emails that ended up on WikiLeaks, and they have tried to say from the get-go that the Russians hacked them. Instead of letting the FBI forensically examine their servers, they hired a company called CrowdStrike to come in and do it. They’re a private sector high-tech firm.

And literally when I saw the word CrowdStrike uttered by the president in the transcript of the call with the Ukrainian president, Trump asks Zelensky about CrowdStrike, and Zelensky indicated he’s gonna reopen the investigation of CrowdStrike because they’re linked to Ukraine.

Ukraine is all over the presidential campaign. In fact, you go back January 2016, right around Trump’s inauguration, three Democrat senators are asking Ukraine to investigate Trump. All of this that they’re accusing Trump of doing the Democrats have already done it. So I think what’s going on, I think Trump’s actually asking Zelensky for help. And, by the way, there’s some really juicy stuff. These guys both dump on Angela Merkel. They talk about how incompetent she is.

Zelensky, the new president of Ukraine, loves Trump, he’s talking about how he has followed Trump’s guidelines and almost been a mentor to him, wants to drain the swamp in Ukraine, actually used that phrase. He’s ecstatic to have Trump on the phone. Trump didn’t demand, didn’t ask, didn’t promise, didn’t blackmail, didn’t withhold.

He said (paraphrasing), “You oughta look into this CrowdStrike, you know, they’re deep into this and Biden and his son and so forth.” ‘Cause Trump is fed up, folks, with this charge that he didn’t win in 2016 legitimately and fairly, and he is not gonna stop until he beats this back. CrowdStrike is the security firm the DNC hired to look at its supposedly hacked servers.

It was CrowdStrike and only CrowdStrike that said it had moderate confidence the servers were hacked by the Russians. If that ever falls apart on the Democrats — the Democrats have more trouble. And Biden is in more trouble than he knows now. I don’t know if he’s figured this out yet.

Related Links
RushLimbaugh.com: Trump to Release Ukraine Phone Call Transcript — Tomorrow - 09.24.19
Breitbart: Donald Trump Taunts Impeachment Democrats: ‘Got Them by Surprise’ with Transcript Release
Federalist Papers: Trump Releases Transcript Of Ukrainian Phone Call, Major Bust For Democrats
Daily Caller: Report: White House Planning To Give Whistleblower Complaint To Congress Within Days
AP: Pelosi Orders Impeachment Probe: 'No One is Above the Law'
New York Post: Pelosi’s Impeachment Flip-Flop Changes Everything - Michael Goodwin
ARCHIVES CALENDAR

Share This
      
RushLimbaugh.com - © 2019 Premiere Networks. All Rights Reserved.
Contact | Privacy Policy | Contest Rules | Rush 24/7 Terms & Conditions | AdChoices Ad choice

Tuesday, September 27, 2022

9/26/22: ARMAGEDDON LIKE – MOVING HEAVEN AND EARTH

SHOW TRANSCRIPT: 

So we all can breathe a sigh of relief as the 24th came and went and since most people were nowhere near a newscast that wasn’t talking about January 6th, Mara Lago, or Trump — you may have blinked and not realized that even though Armageddon did not come all at once — there were a lot of Armageddon-like things happened that need to be addressed.

It is difficult to absorb the evidential truth and changing minds accordingly would be a struggle because of 6 years of priming. People in general no longer know up from down—as they blindly navigate the bizarre-o streets of the twilight zone still bitching about  2016 and the loss of Hillary Clinton to the evil orange Hitler with a comb-over.

There is not much more than their senses pick up as automatically, as it used to be, or identified accurately.

Instead, the identification can be easily confused.  It would be easy to just yuck it up as a conspiracy theory and an overreactive imagination.  Well, that may be partially correct – but I often wonder what is expected when dates get thrown around– I assume that people expect us all to be dead and buried under nuclear charcoal.

Or that a huge asteroid is coming into view, and that when it hits we will be swallowed up by mud and fire.

We have been bombarded by apocalyptic movies for decades that only the simplest of minds requires a Hollywood version of everything,

If the reality is less exciting then there will be no reason to prepare and no reason to contemplate how madmen have hijacked this planet.

Nothing is real. Our senses can’t tell us a thing we can trust anymore.

Certainly, we can no longer believe anything we see on the screen or on the internet, CGI has taken over digitally, and synthetically, painting nearly every scene in a film. Even the actors may be fake. How many UFO videos online are faked? How many shootings are faked? How many people call everything a false flag –  because things are getting too Armageddon like.

Anymore I see that many people think that everything else is fake; nothing is to be believed at face value. Anything our senses are asked to evaluate as evidence is rejected as such, like in a magic show.

Nothing can be trusted anymore until some certain type of authority says it can be. There’s the catch.

You need to have a mainstream news stooge tell you that something happened on September 24th in order for you to accept it. If you ignore it or don’t see it you can pretend it is not there.

As per dozens of articles you may read, every website you visit, every news feed you absorb it is the great skill of the “powers that be” at the head of all this psychological manipulation. And it makes things easier that the masses fall for it all, hook, line, and sinker– it makes it easier to dismiss as well.. it is easy to point fingers at the foolish — even though predictions are not always accurate or to the nth degree.

If you have nearly no system of determining reality (your senses and common sense), and have never been taught to critically think so you can ascertain the truth with a blindfold on, then you are going to be looking for someone to whisper in your ear to describe what it is you are looking at but cannot see.

Some of us at least. Not all.

So maybe you are a little disappointed that the world didn’t end on the 24th. That of course has not slowed down the option of pushing forward with Armageddon or making the world more Armageddon like.

The 24th came and went and many people I am sure were not satisfied with what did happen. I don’t know what people expected but as I said the biggest guarantee that nothing is going to happen is to give it an exact date. That is why I always like to look at windows of opportunity where a potential event could happen.

The way things feel I think it is super close. After all we need that October surprise before the midterms.

With people dropping left and right, diseases and cancer on the rise, excess deaths, heart issues, clotting, and people inexplicably getting sick –leaving scientists baffled you have to admit that this is a bit Armageddon like.

On the 24th of September, it was reported that scientists discovered a new, COVID-like virus called Khosta-2 originating from a Russian bat. It is believed to be capable of infecting humans and would be resistant to current vaccines.

Khosta-2 can be found in Horseshoe bats. They carry what is known as sarbecoviruses — part of the coronavirus family — are rife across Asia and eastern Europe.

In the latest research, virologists have found spike proteins from Khosta-2 can infect human cells. It is resistant to both the monoclonal antibodies and serum from individuals vaccinated against COVID-19.

Both Khosta-2 and SARS- CoV-2 belong to the same sub-category of coronaviruses known as sarbecoviruses. The study highlights the need to develop universal vaccines to protect against sarbecoviruses in general, rather than just against known variants of SARS-CoV-2.

Scientists are reporting that animals all over Europe and Asia are coming down with it — if it spreads to humans it would pose a threat to global health and ongoing vaccine campaigns against SARS-CoV-2.

So far there is no vaccine and you can bet it is just waiting to be used as a chemical weapon as the Russians start acting all Armageddon like by threatening Europe and the United States with Chemical and Nuclear attacks.

Yes even though the world didn’t end on September 24th — things just got a little more Armageddon like.

I wonder if this counts as a direct hit– or an almost there kind of thing.

Because I know that in this Apocalypse we are living in everything is black and white, truth and lies, life and death. And people are insanely sticking to their own narrative, which is just a reflection of the mainstream narrative—like bleating sheep in a storm who won’t go into the barn until lightning strikes

the mainstream narrative has been relentless in ignoring the fact that they kept telling us that President Trump was going to push us to the brink of World War III and now President Biden has achieved this we are reminded of January 6th, and MAGA terrorists.

The media just loves to push this into the hearts and souls (and heads) of those who are susceptible to such brainwashing.

But the mainstream media is avoiding what the global media is saying.

On September 24th, the world media came just short of saying that Russia has declared World War III.

Starting with the Russian State media it was reported over the weekend that nuclear war appears to be “a given” and “everyone will be destroyed” if the West “pushes Russia into a corner”.

Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said that strategic nuclear weapons can be used to defend “the Donbass republics and other territories accepted into Russia” and warned the “retired idiots with general’s stripes” at NATO that hypersonic missiles can “reach targets in Europe and in the United States.”

Medevev says that the Russian authorities have decided to incorporate the republics of Donbass and “other territories” into the country. The new regions will be protected with the help of those mobilized.

Russia can use any weapon, “including strategic ones,” so “no need to intimidate Moscow.”

Moscow replaced its top logistics general on Saturday after a series of setbacks as Kremlin-held regions of eastern and southern Ukraine voted for a second day on becoming part of Russia.

The voting on whether Russia should annex four regions of Ukraine started on Friday, dramatically raising the stakes seven months after Moscow’s troops invaded.

US President Joe Biden has dismissed the referendums as a “sham… a false pretext to try to annex parts of Ukraine by force in flagrant violation of international law”.

Russia’s invasion and recent gains by the Ukrainian army in a lightening counter-offensive have laid bare important logistical flaws with some analysts seeing logistics as the weak link in Moscow’s army.

Lest you think otherwise September 24th felt a little Armageddon like –as Russia is taking the special military operation and turning it into open war. The partial mobilization of Russia’s army reserves to add a total of 300,000 men to the military campaign in Ukraine has been widely reported in the Western press.

It is a foregone conclusion that the Donbas republics and other territories of Ukraine now under Russian occupation will vote to join the Russian Federation.

In the case of Donetsk and Lugansk, it was only under pressure from Moscow that their 2014 referendums were about declaring sovereignty and not about becoming part of Russia. Such annexation or merger was not welcomed by the Kremlin back then because Russia was not ready to face the expected massive economic, political and military attack from the West which would have followed.

Today, Moscow is more than ready: indeed it has survived very well all the economic sanctions imposed by the West from even before  February 24th as well as the ever growing supply to Ukraine of military material and ‘advisers’ from the NATO countries.

The vote over joining Russia will likely hit 90% or more in favor. What will immediately follow on the Russian side is also perfectly clear: within hours of the declaration of referendum results, the Russian State Duma will pass a bill on ‘reunification’ of these territories with Russia and within a day or so, it will be approved by the upper chamber of parliament and immediately thereafter the bill will be signed into law by President Putin.

What follows from the formal merger of these territories with Russia?

That is also perfectly clear. As integral parts of Russia, any attack on them, and there certainly will be such attacks coming from the Ukrainian armed forces, most definitely provoke an even greater open war. But even before that, the referendums have been preceded by the announcement of mobilization, which points directly to what Russia will do further if developments on the field of battle so require.

Russia is ready for World War III — and we are ready to sue President Trump and his family.

How nice is this?

Are we that arrogant or are we ignorant to how Armageddon like things are getting? Progressive phases of mobilization will be justified to the Russian public as necessary to defend the borders of the Russian Federation from attack by NATO.

The merger of the Russia-occupied Ukrainian territories with the Russian Federation will mark the end of the ‘special military operation.’

Adding another 300,000 men at arms to the force deployed by Russia in Ukraine represents a near doubling and surely will address the shortages of infantry numbers that have limited Russia’s ability to ‘conquer’ Ukraine.

Confusion over who would be called up has led to an exodus of young men out of Russia, with long lines forming at Russia’s borders and air tickets out of the country hard to come by.

Demonstrations against the draft effort earlier in the week led to more than 1,300 arrests, according to rights groups. So far, demonstrations in Moscow appeared to be mostly attended by young Russian women — after protests earlier this week saw detained young men served draft papers while in police custody.

Russia has explicitly stated that any aggression against its own security and territorial integrity, such as has been raised by generals in retirement in the USA speaking to national television in the past several weeks about Russia’s break-up, will be met by a nuclear response. When Russia’s nuclear threat is directed at Washington, as is now the case, rather than at Kiev or Brussels, the supposition till now, it is unlikely that policymakers on Capitol Hill will long remain cavalier about Russian military capabilities and pursue further escalation.

Again will anybody comment on how Armageddon like things have become and how the President that was supposed to lead us further away from nuclear war is pushing us closer to it?

France is now concerned and has developed a plan or at least has commented on the Nuclear strategy Russia might employ.

Analysts say Moscow would likely deploy one or more “tactical” or battlefield nuclear bombs. These are small weapons, ranging from 0.3 kilotons to 100 kilotons of explosive power, compared to the 1.2 megatons of the largest US strategic warhead or the 58 megaton bomb Russia tested in 1961.

Tactical bombs are designed to have a limited impact on the battlefield, compared to strategic nuclear weapons which are designed to fight and win all-out wars.

But “small” and “limited” are relative: The atomic bomb the US dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 to devastating effect was just 15 kilotons.

What would Moscow target?

Analysts say Russia’s goal in using a tactical nuclear bomb in Ukraine would be to frighten it into surrender or submission to negotiations and to divide the country’s Western backers.

Russia would not likely use nuclear weapons on the front lines. Capturing 20 miles of territory could require 20 small nuclear bombs — small gains for the huge risks of introducing nuclear weapons and nuclear fallout.

Soon after Russian President Vladimir Putin’s speech announcing partial mobilization of national forces for the operation in Ukraine, which included a hint of willingness to resort to the nuclear defense of Russia’s territorial integrity, Navy Admiral Charles A. Richard – who currently serves as the US Strategic Command chief – confirmed that the Pentagon is taking the Russian nuclear threat seriously.

Remember the dead don’t talk about media narratives that have failed. Those who are aware of all of the world’s moves can see that things are becoming more Armageddon like.

In another peculiar event that took place Saturday. eagle-eyed believers in UFOs happened across a peculiar change on the website for the National Intelligence Manager for Aviation. The office, which reports to the Director of National Intelligence updated its logo to include the image of a classic saucer-shaped UFO.

While other common crafts are included in the logo, including a commercial jet, a fighter jet, a stealth bomber, and a satellite, the logo also includes the standard—most well-known, if you will—the shape of a UFO: the flying saucer.

This August, peculiar wording was included in an intelligence budget report suggesting some UFOs weren’t man-made. The phrasing instructed officials to focus their attention on spotted unidentified aircraft that were confirmed to be not be made by known sources.

“Temporary no attributed objects, or those that are positively identified as man-made after analysis, will be passed to appropriate offices and should not be considered under the definition as unidentified aerospace-undersea phenomena,” the report said.

After the report surfaced, a former Department of Defense staffer wrote in an op-ed that the verbiage suggests officials know there are some UAP not of this planet.

But what is most curious and quite Armageddon like is that now NASA is cow conducting target practice on an asteroid that isn’t even a threat to us.

NASA is about to slam a spacecraft into an asteroid, obliterating the probe and nudging the space rock.

The Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) is aiming for an asteroid called Dimorphos, which is orbiting a giant asteroid called Didymos. By crashing into it, NASA hopes to push the smaller space rock into a new orbit closer to its parent asteroid. The impact is practice for deflecting dangerous asteroids away from our planet.

Dimorphos is 535 feet wide — big enough to obliterate a city like New York. That’s no cause for concern, since it isn’t on an Earth-bound trajectory, and DART won’t change its path through the solar system. But that makes it perfect practice for one of the biggest threats in our cosmic neighborhood: city-killer asteroids, clocking in at 460 feet or larger.

Having a tried-and-true deflection method won’t help protect Earth from asteroids if nobody sees them coming, though. Experts previously told Insider that NASA would need five to 10 years to build and launch a customized mission to deflect an incoming asteroid.

To date, scientists have only identified 40% of city-killer asteroids orbiting near Earth, NASA estimates. Nobody knows where the rest of them are, or where they’re going. But here is the kicker, while we have funneled a lot of our money into the war effort — The Biden administration has given some money to the Near-Earth Object (NEO) Surveyor program.

NEO Surveyor has made slow progress, though, and it just took another big hit. At the beginning of 2022, the mission got an infusion of $143.2 million to propel it toward launch. But NASA has since rescinded $33 million of that budget for this year.

The project’s budget has been slashed by $100 million for 2023.

This will delay the launch of s telescope that could detect many deadly asteroids that would make everything Armageddon like on earth.

Asteroids have already surprised humans a few times in recent years.

In 2013, a house-sized asteroid screamed into the skies above Chelyabinsk, Russia, and exploded. The blast sent out a shock wave that broke windows, damaged buildings, and injured more than 1,400 people. No one on Earth saw it coming. That same day, a larger asteroid came within 17,000 miles of the planet.

Jim Bridenstine, who served as the Trump administration’s NASA administrator, said in 2019 that the agency’s modeling suggested an event like the Chelyabinsk meteor occurs about every 60 years.

But the Chelyabinsk rock was small — about 50 feet wide. In 2019, a 427-foot, “city-killer” space rock flew within 45,000 miles of Earth, and NASA had almost no warning about that either.

On June 22th, 2019 a small asteroid entered Earth’s atmosphere and exploded in broad daylight south of Puerto Rico. The explosion was picked up on video and was also recorded by the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty Organization’s infrasound station in Bermuda. They pegged the blast energy between 3 and 5 kilotons of TNT–a fraction of a WW II atomic bomb. The explosion was clearly visible in images from NOAA’s GOES-16 weather satellite.

Meteor expert Peter Brown of the University of Western Ontario says the infrasound signal is consistent with a “small multi-meter sized near-Earth asteroid.” According to data compiled by NASA’s Center for Near Earth Object Studies, asteroids of this size and energy hit Earth’s atmosphere about once a year. That means it’s rare–but not exceptionally so.

The asteroid fragmented as it ripped through the atmosphere. This infrared image from the GOES-16 satellite shows the space rock splitting into at least 3 pieces. The asteroid was the size of a refrigerator and was first spotted by telescopes in Hawaii on Saturday, just before it collided with Earth’s atmosphere and burned as a fireball.

The space rock, officially named 2019 MO, never had a chance of making it to the ground or doing much damage, as it was only about a tenth the size of the bolide that exploded in the atmosphere over Russia in 2013.

What’s most interesting about 2019 MO, though, is the fact that it was spotted by telescopes right before it exploded. That’s only happened four times in history, according to Italian amateur astronomer Ernesto Guido.

The other three times all happened in the last 12 years, including asteroid 2018 LA that made it all the way to the ground in Africa.

Then in 2020, an asteroid the size of a car passed closer to Earth than any known space rock had ever come without crashing. It missed our planet by about 1,830 miles. Astronomers didn’t know the asteroid existed until about six hours after it whizzed by. Nobody saw it coming, because it was approaching from the direction of the sun.

Telescopes on the ground can only observe the sky at night, which means they miss almost everything that flies at us from the sun. NEO Surveyor, from its perch in Earth’s orbit, would be able to spot such space rocks. Since it would use infrared light, it could also spot asteroids that are too dark for Earth-based telescopes.

If the DART impact is a success, NASA will be better equipped to divert any Earth-bound asteroid NEO Surveyor might discover.

Even with the budgets being cut for NEO research, a lot of the budgets have been diverted for a war footing that can lead to our destruction and to Climate Change — which is being exchanged under the radar for geoengineering projects that could destroy or disrupt the fragile jet stream and the Polar Ice caps.

Over the weekend, Scientists presented a controversial plan whereby high-flying jets similar to a modified American KC-135R could spray microscopic aerosol particles into the atmosphere to refreeze the North and South Poles. The recently published research in IOP’s Environmental Research Communications suggests that the method would be feasible and fairly cheap.

The plan, which falls under a controversial climate intervention technology called Stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), would target only subpolar regions- instead of having a global intervention that most other SIA operations assume, highlights the paper.

The researchers argue that ‘hand-me-down’ (reused) military air-to-air refueling tankers such as the aged KC-135 and the A330 MMRT don’t have enough payload at the required altitudes- even when modified. They, therefore, submit the SAIL-43K as an efficient candidate for the subpolar mission.

A fleet of 125 of these SAIL-43K tankers would release a cloud of microscopic sulfur dioxide particles, which at an altitude of 43,000 feet (13 kilometers) and latitude of 60 degrees north and south- could loft a payload sufficient to cool the regions by two degrees per year. Areas such as Anchorage, southern Alaska, and the southern tip of Patagonia- could return close to their pre-industrial average temperatures.

Upon slowly drifting towards the poles by ferrying on high-altitude winds, the particles would slightly shade the Earth’s surface beneath.

Still, the paper highlights that such an operation would be equivalent to more than two days of global commercial air traffic in 2021, or about two-thirds of the annual flights departing New York’s Kennedy Airport.

The SIA operation would tap into the healthy number of pre-existing commercial airfields in the Northern Hemisphere that could serve as operational bases for a polar SAI operation. Anchorage, for example, has three runways longer than 10,600 feet, and whilst located at 61.2°N latitude—this would be close enough for the purpose.

For the southern hemisphere, it’s a little more complicated. 60 degrees of the south pole touches nowhere on land and is inhabitable. The closest significant airfields are in Chile and Argentina at the southern tip of Patagonia. As sub-optimal bases here may be relative to the 60°S target, the researchers reveal they will have to serve.

Additionally, the paper highlights that the ground infrastructure for any pre-existing base would need to be greatly enhanced to accommodate the program.

None dare call it a massive chemtrail program — and none dare call it Armageddon like –and now one wishes to notice that the powers that be wish to move heaven and earth into a mode of destruction so that they can build back better.

In the span of human history, we have seen many occasions events that have changed the way mankind conducts its affairs. However, we have never lived in those times. Most of us have only read about them and romanticized the events as prophetic, epic, and miraculous to name a few overused adjectives.

History at times can be ruthless about events deemed tragic and during times of victory, can be overzealous about the events. This is all about projected beliefs and faith that these events occurred somewhere out of the blue, beyond the norm, and therefore need to be mentioned and chronicled as life-changing.

We tend to think in terms of cause and effect or A causes B.

We are now in the Twilight Zone where “B” causes “A” and it is useless to overthink or dismiss an open conspiracy about the moves towards following a blueprint for the apocalypse.

We are being told that our days have been numbered. We either hear it from the New Age thinkers who see doomsday in ancient calendars or we are told by politicians and scientists that our days on earth will be cut short because of Earth changes and dire predictions of environmental disaster due to the abuses we have allegedly committed against nature.

Whether it’s a pandemic, nuclear or environmental disaster, apocalypse, and destruction, it fascinates all of us. If science fiction is, as literature of ideas that may transpire in the future, then apocalyptic science fiction is the literature of how ideas go wrong — an exploration of all of our bad possible futures, and what might happen after.

Natural and human disasters, global acts of political, economic, religious, and military terrorism, domestic violence, and the rumors of war are not only triggering post-traumatic stress, but it is producing some parapsychological effects on the populace – virtually no research has been done in parapsychology on the effects of traumatic experiences on peoples’ lives and how it affects perceptions of religious faith, precognitive dreams of an apocalyptic future, mental manifestations and geological effects on the planet.

So buck up — if you are a little disappointed that September 24th didn’t have the right amount of Armageddon to satisfy you just think there is more doom on the calendar as we can see that the powers that be are already preparing for the worst.

The current paradigm looks like it might be being readied for a controlled demolition like so much else.


https://groundzeromedia.org/9-26-22-armageddon-like-moving-heaven-and-earth-w-dr-kevin-mccairn/